Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10783
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDale, G-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-08T11:50:22Z-
dc.date.available2010-
dc.date.available2015-05-08T11:50:22Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationDialectical Anthropology, 34(1): 29 - 41, (March 2010)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0304-4092-
dc.identifier.urihttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10624-010-9169-7-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10783-
dc.description.abstractWhen one considers anthropology’s recent encounter with ‘globalisation’ -- whether understood as a “totalizing” discourse (Tsing 2000), as the dialectical antinomy of localization, as expanding constellations of diasporas and transnational social spaces” (Basch, Glick-Schiller & Szanton 1994), or as webs of legal and illegal trade (Nordstrom 2007) -- it can be profitable to recall the precursors. By this I mean anthropologists who consistently brought a historical-theoretical concern with global processes to bear upon local ethnography, and vice versa. Those that are name-checked in this connection tend to include Marxian theorists such as Eric Wolf, Michael Taussig, Sidney Mintz, and Maurice Godelier, but another important figure was Karl Polanyi.en_US
dc.format.extent29 - 41-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.subjectAnthropologyen_US
dc.titlePolanyian meditations on economy and society: a review of ‘Market Society: The Great Transformation Today’en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10624-010-9169-7-
dc.relation.isPartOfDialectical Anthropology-
pubs.issue1-
pubs.issue1-
pubs.volume34-
pubs.volume34-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf241.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.