Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1304
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKang, J-
dc.contributor.authorHadfield, M-
dc.coverage.spatial10en
dc.date.accessioned2007-11-16T10:50:24Z-
dc.date.available2007-11-16T10:50:24Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.citationMaterials and Design. 24(8): 595-604en
dc.identifier.issn0261-3069-
dc.identifier.uriwww.elsevier.com/wps/product/cws_home/30454en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1304-
dc.description.abstractAccelerated four-ball and five-ball rolling tests were performed on HIPed Si3N4 ball samples (rough lapped with surface roughness value Ra0.08 μm and Rq0.118 μm) in fully lubricated condition. The contact load and the stress cycles per minute for four-ball rolling and five-ball rolling tests were maintained the same. The rolling track appearances of five-ball tests reveal severe sliding occurred. In one case, the opposite arc cracks were generated all over the two sides of the rolling track, and this could not be explained by simplified kinematics model. The failure mechanisms were discussed, which suggest the sliding on the two sides of the track was in the opposite direction.en
dc.format.extent1553635 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.subjectEngineering ceramicsen
dc.subjectFatigueen
dc.subjectFailure analysisen
dc.titleComparison of 4-ball and 5-ball rolling contact fatigue tests on lubricated Si3N4/steel contacten
dc.typeResearch Paperen
Appears in Collections:Design
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Brunel Design School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf1.52 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.