Reply to Lassiter

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1340

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Gobet, F	-
dc.contributor.author	Simon, H A	-
dc.coverage.spatial	3	en
dc.date.accessioned	2007-11-24T12:23:41Z	-
dc.date.available	2007-11-24T12:23:41Z	-
dc.date.issued	2000	-
dc.identifier.citation	Gobet, F. & Simon, H. A. (2000). Reply to Lassiter. Psychological Science, Volume 11, Number 2, March 2000 , pp. 174-174(1)	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1340	-
dc.description.abstract	Lassiter’s new data on search and pattern recognition in chess are interesting, but his conclusions about their implications for theory are unfounded.	en
dc.format.extent	21687 bytes	-
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	-
dc.language.iso	en	-
dc.publisher	Blackwell Publishing The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com	en
dc.subject	chess	en
dc.subject	pattern recognition	en
dc.subject	search	en
dc.subject	expertise	en
dc.subject	correspondence chess	en
dc.subject	Kasparov	en
dc.subject	Holding	en
dc.title	Reply to Lassiter	en
dc.type	Research Paper	en
dc.identifier.doi	https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00235	-
Appears in Collections:	Psychology Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
FullText.pdf		21.18 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open