Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, G-
dc.identifier.citationOpen Review of Educational Research, 2014, 1 (1), pp. 70 - 83en_US
dc.description.abstractThe interest of higher education researchers in entrepreneurialism in European universities began in the late 1990s with the appearance of two path-breaking books: Sheila Slaughter and Larry Leslie on Academic Capitalism and Burton Clark on Creating Entrepreneurial Universities. Since that time ‘entrepreneurial’ has become a popular term to describe what many people, politicians in particular, believe is necessary for university survival, and indeed economic survival, as the new paradigm of development. Drawing mostly from a three-year comparative study undertaken as part of the European Framework social science research programme, this article explores whether this new paradigm of ‘development’ is a contingent result of the huge expansion of higher education in the previous quarter century or whether it is primarily the result of ideological changes which have led to the current global dominance of neo-liberalism. The view we have attempted to put forward is the latter. The article deploys ideas and research from governmentality theory to suggest some limitations of the use of empirical data in current higher education policy research and some ways of thinking differently about entrepreneurialism and Clark’s ‘pathways of transformation’ to the universities he studied. The article offers a short example of the useful work that social theory can do in relation to policy agendas like university entrepreneurialism which often lie unproblematized within higher policy and practice.en_US
dc.format.extent70 - 83-
dc.subjecthigher education policyen_US
dc.subjectsocial theoryen_US
dc.titleAcademic capitalism and entrepreneurial universities as a new paradigm of ‘Development’en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfOpen Review of Educational Research-
pubs.notespeerreview_statement: The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope. aims_and_scope_url:
Appears in Collections:Dept of Social Sciences Media and Communications Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf361.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.