Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/16929
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTainturier, M-J-
dc.contributor.authorBosse, M-L-
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, DJ-
dc.contributor.authorValdois, S-
dc.contributor.authorRapp, B-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-03T10:28:36Z-
dc.date.available2013-
dc.date.available2018-10-03T10:28:36Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychology, 2013, 4en_US
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/16929-
dc.description.abstractThe general aim of this study is to contribute to a better understanding of the cognitive processes that underpin skilled adult spelling. More specifically, it investigates the influence of lexical neighbors on pseudo-word spelling with the goal of providing a more detailed account of the interaction between lexical and sublexical sources of knowledge in spelling. In prior research examining this topic, adult participants typically heard lists composed of both words and pseudo-words and had to make a lexical decision to each stimulus before writing the pseudo-words. However, these priming paradigms are susceptible to strategic influence and may therefore not give a clear picture of the processes normally engaged in spelling unfamiliar words. In our two Experiments involving 71 French-speaking literate adults, only pseudo-words were presented which participants were simply requested to write to dictation using the first spelling that came to mind. Unbeknownst to participants, pseudo-words varied according to whether they did or did not have a phonological word neighbor. Results revealed that low-probability phoneme/grapheme mappings (e.g., /o/ -> aud in French) were used significantly more often in spelling pseudo-words with a close phonological lexical neighbor with that spelling (e.g., /krepo/ derived from “crapaud,” /krapo/) than in spelling pseudo-words with no close neighbors (e.g., /frøpo/). In addition, the strength of this lexical influence increased with the lexical frequency of the word neighbors as well as with their degree of phonetic overlap with the pseudo-word targets.These results indicate that information from lexical and sublexical processes is integrated in the course of spelling, and a specific theoretical account as to how such integration may occur is introduced.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.subjectPseudoword spellingen_US
dc.subjectSkilled spellingen_US
dc.subjectLiteracyen_US
dc.subjectSpelling modelen_US
dc.subjectNeighborhood activationen_US
dc.titleLexical neighborhood effects in pseudoword spellingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00862-
dc.relation.isPartOfFrontiers in Psychology-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume4-
dc.identifier.eissn1664-1078-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf636.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.