Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/17651
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDale, G-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-11T12:23:00Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-11T12:23:00Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationCritical Sociology, 2019, 45(7-8): 1047 – 1060en_US
dc.identifier.issn0896-9205-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/17651-
dc.description.abstract© The Author(s). This article critically examines two conceptualisations of ordoliberalism. In one, it is defined, together with neoliberalism, against 19th-century liberalism (in its social liberal and laissez-faire variants). This reading was common among ordoliberals themselves, and early neoliberals such as Friedrich von Hayek, as well as among critics, notably Michel Foucault. In another, ordoliberalism is contrasted to neoliberalism, with the latter presumed to be a species of laissez-faire economics. This reading is commonly accompanied by the supposition that ordoliberalism represents a “Third Way” between capitalism and socialism, or between laissez-faire liberalism and state planning. The main body of this contribution presents a critical analysis of both positions, by way of analysis of ordoliberal texts and a history of the discourse of laissez-faire.-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGEen_US
dc.subjectordoliberalismen_US
dc.subjectneoliberalismen_US
dc.subjectlaissez-faireen_US
dc.subjectThird Wayen_US
dc.subjectAustrian School-
dc.titleJustificatory fables of ordoliberalism: Laissez-faire and the ‘Third Way’en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177%2F0896920519832638-
dc.relation.isPartOfCritical Sociology-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf118.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.