Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1999
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFan, Y-
dc.coverage.spatial3en
dc.date.accessioned2008-04-14T10:20:43Z-
dc.date.available2008-04-14T10:20:43Z-
dc.date.issued1995-
dc.identifier.citationThe Proceedings of Conference on Dissent in Management Thought.London. Sep 1995,pp 1-3.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1999-
dc.description.abstractThere is still considerable confusion around the concept of strategic groups (SG). In conventional research, cluster analysis has been a dominant methodology to form groups. Whether or under what conditions firms in the industry are 'clusterable' was largely ignored in prior studies. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the problems with cluster analysis in strategic group formation. The setting for the analysis is the UK computer industry. Multiple cluster procedures are employed to form SGs using both secondary data and survey data. Results of different groupings are compared and problems associated with cluster analysis are discussed.en
dc.format.extent31744 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherHenry Stewart Publications, Londonen
dc.subjectStrategic groups, cluster analysis, competitive groupingen
dc.titleStrategic groups and cluster analysisen
dc.typeConference Paperen
Appears in Collections:Marketing
Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Closed Access Paper.txt269 BTextView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.