Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21076
Title: Validity and reliability of the newly developed Malay-language health belief of bloating (HB-Bloat) scale
Authors: Abdullah, N
Kueh, YC
Kuan, G
Wong, MS
Yahaya, FH
Lee, YY
Keywords: abdominal bloating;questionnaire;theory of planned behavior;intention;self-management;lifestyle;quality of life
Issue Date: 17-Apr-2020
Publisher: MDPI
Citation: Abdullah, N., Kueh, Y.C., Kuan, G., Wong, M.S., Yahaya, F.H. and Lee, Y.Y. (2020) ‘Validity and Reliability of the Newly Developed Malay-Language Health Belief of Bloating (HB-Bloat) Scale’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (8), 2773, pp. 1-11. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082773.
Abstract: Copyright © 2020 by the authors. Abdominal bloating (AB), a common complaint that affects quality of life and disturbs psychological well-being, is largely a behavioral-driven disorder. We aimed to develop and validate a new health belief of bloating (HB-Bloat) scale in the Malay language. The initial item pool was developed based on the theory of planned behavior, empirical literatures, expert review and in-depth interviews. Using the population with bloating (diagnosed based on the Rome IV criteria and pictogram), exploratory and confirmatory factor analytical approaches (EFA and CFA, respectively) were utilized to explore and confirm the domains in the new scale. There were 150 and 323 respondents in the EFA and CFA, respectively. There were 45 items in the initial scale, but it was reduced to 32 items after content validity and pre-testing. In EFA, 17 items with three (3) structure factors (attitude 4 items, subjective norm 7 items, and perceived behavior control 6 items) were identified. Total variance explained by the EFA model was 40.92%. The Cronbach alpha of the three (3) factors ranged from 0.61 to 0.79. With CFA, the three factors model was further tested. Five problematic items were identified and removed. The final measurement model fit the data well (root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA (90% CI) = 0.054 (0.038, 0.070), Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.941, Tucker–Lewis Fit Index (TLI) = 0.924, and standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) = 0.044). The construct reliability of the final measurement model ranged from 0.76 to 0.84. As a conclusion, the new HB-Bloat scale is a valid and reliable tool for assessment of health beliefs in bloating.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21076
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082773
ISSN: 1661-7827
Other Identifiers: 2773
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf640.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons