Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24122
Title: Neo-colonial hierarchies of knowledge in marketing: Toxic field and illusio
Other Titles: Toxic Field and Illusio: a study of neocolonial hierarchies of knowledge in marketing
Authors: Yalkin, C
Ozbilgin, M
Issue Date: 2-Mar-2022
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Citation: Yalkin, C and Ozbilgin, M. (2022) 'Neo-colonial hierarchies of knowledge in marketing: Toxic field and illusio', Marketing Theory: an international review, 0 (in press).
Abstract: Copyright © The Author(s) 2022. We explore the knowledge production experiences of marketing academics who currently work in countries that have previously colonized their home countries. Building on Bourdieu’s concepts of illusio and the field, we first demonstrate that participants are drawn to the appeal of the academic game which perpetuates itself as a toxic field of neo-colonial relations. Second, we illustrate that two dominant exploitative academic practices sustain this toxic field. Third, we demonstrate that there is a toxic illusio which prevents academics from developing a healthy sense of colonial relations in their knowledge production.
Description: Working title: 'Toxic Field and Illusio: a study of neocolonial hierarchies of knowledge in marketing'.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24122
ISSN: 1470-5931
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfYalkin, C. and Özbilgin, M. F. (2022) ‘Neo-colonial hierarchies of knowledge in marketing: Toxic field and illusio’, Marketing Theory, (0 (00)) pp. 1-19. Copyright © The Author(s) 2022. DOI: 10.1177/14705931221075369. (Article reuse guidelines: https://sagepub.com/journals-permissions).532.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.