Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24133
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBennetts, R-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson Humphrey, P-
dc.contributor.authorZielinska, P-
dc.contributor.authorBate, S-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-17T22:59:52Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-17T22:59:52Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-16-
dc.identifier18-
dc.identifier.citationBennetts, R., Johnson Humphrey, P., Zielinska, P. and Bate, S. (2022) 'Face masks versus sunglasses: Limited effects of time and individual differences in the ability to judge facial identity and social traits', Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7, 18, pp. 1-24. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00371-z.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24133-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © The Author(s) 2022. Some research indicates that face masks impair identification and other judgements such as trustworthiness. How- ever, it is unclear whether those effects have abated over time as individuals adjust to widespread use of masks, or whether performance is related to individual differences in face recognition ability. This study examined the effect of masks and sunglasses on face matching and social judgements (trustworthiness, competence, attractiveness). In Experiment 1, 135 participants across three different time points (June 2020–July 2021) viewed unedited faces and faces with masks, sunglasses, or both. Both masks and sunglasses similarly decreased matching performance. The effect of masks on social judgements varied depending on the judgement and whether the face was depicted with sunglasses. There was no effect of timepoint on any measure, suggesting that the effects of masks have not dimin- ished. In Experiment 2, 12 individuals with developmental prosopagnosia (DP) and 10 super-recognisers (SRs) com- pleted the same tasks. The effect of masks on identity matching was reduced in SRs, whereas the effects of masks and sunglasses for the DP group did not differ from controls. These findings indicate that face masks significantly affect face perception, depending on the availability of other facial information, and are not modified by exposure.-
dc.description.sponsorshipRB is supported by a Brunel University London BRIEF award (ref 1086); SB is supported by a Leverhulme Research Fellowship (RF-2020-105).en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 24-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central (Springer Nature) on behalf of the Psychonomic Societyen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectface coveringsen_US
dc.subjectface recognitionen_US
dc.subjecttrait judgementsen_US
dc.subjectprosopagnosiaen_US
dc.subjectsuper recognisersen_US
dc.titleFace masks versus sunglasses: Limited effects of time and individual differences in the ability to judge facial identity and social traitsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00371-z-
dc.relation.isPartOfCognitive Research: Principles and Implications-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume7-
dc.identifier.eissn2365-7464-
Appears in Collections:Brunel OA Publishing Fund
Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.1.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons