Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26703
Title: Validating the Breathing Vigilance Questionnaire for use in Dysfunctional Breathing
Authors: Steinmann, J
Lewis, A
Ellmers, TJ
Jones, M
MacBean, V
Kal, E
Issue Date: 6-Apr-2023
Publisher: European Respiratory Society
Citation: Steinmann, J. et al. (2023) 'Validating the Breathing Vigilance Questionnaire for use in Dysfunctional Breathing', European Respiratory Journal, 61 (6), 2300031 (23 pp.). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00031-2023.
Abstract: Copyright © The authors 2023. Background: Dysfunctional breathing is common among people with and without primary respiratory pathology. While anxiety can contribute to dysfunctional breathing, the underpinning mechanism is unclear. One explanation is that anxiety induces conscious, vigilant monitoring of breathing, disrupting “automatic” breathing mechanics. We validated a new tool that quantifies such breathing-related “vigilance”: the Breathing Vigilance Questionnaire (Breathe-VQ). Methods: 323 healthy adults (mean (range) age 27.3 (18–71) years; 161 males) were analysed. We developed an initial Breathe-VQ (11 items, 1–5 Likert scale) based on the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Scale, using feedback from the target population and clinicians. At baseline, participants completed the Breathe-VQ, Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory form 2 and Movement-Specific Reinvestment Scale (assessing general conscious processing). 83 people repeated the Breathe-VQ 3 weeks later. Results: Five items were removed based on item-level analysis. The resulting six-item Breathe-VQ questionnaire (score range 6–30) has excellent internal (α=0.892) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation 0.810), a minimal detectable change of 6.5 and no floor/ceiling effects. Validity was evidenced by significant positive correlations with trait anxiety and conscious processing scores (r=0.35–0.46). Participants at high risk of having dysfunctional breathing (NQ >23; n=76) had significantly higher Breathe-VQ score (mean±sd 19.1±5.0) than low-risk peers (n=225; mean±sd 13.8±5.4; p<0.001). In this “high risk of dysfunctional breathing” group, Breathe-VQ and NQ scores were significantly associated (p=0.005), even when controlling for risk factors (e.g. trait anxiety). Conclusions: The Breathe-VQ is a valid and reliable tool to measure breathing vigilance. High breathing vigilance may contribute to dysfunctional breathing and could represent a therapeutic target. Further research is warranted to test Breathe-VQ's prognostic value and assess intervention effects.
Description: Rights Retention Strategy Statement: This research was supported by Brunel University London, publicly funded by Research England. A CC BY is applied to the AAM arising from this submission, in accordance with the University’s Open Access Mandate. Copyright & Usage Copyright ©The authors 2023. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26703
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00031-2023
ISSN: 0903-1936
Other Identifiers: ORCID iDs: Adam Lewis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-8823;;Mandy Jones https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3588-9060; Victoria MacBean https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0268-2693; Elmar Kal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1481-3016.
2300031
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfRights Retention Strategy Statement: This research was supported by Brunel University London, publicly funded by Research England. A CC BY licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) is applied to the AAM arising from this submission, in accordance with the University’s Open Access Mandate. Copyright & Usage Copyright © The authors 2023. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org691.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons