Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26778
Title: Doing together: reflections on facilitating the co-production of participatory action research with marginalised populations
Authors: Pettican, A
Goodman, B
Bryant, W
Beresford, P
Freeman, P
Gladwell, V
Kilbride, C
Speed, E
Keywords: co-production;participatory action research;disability;disability;physical activity;occupational therapy
Issue Date: 28-Nov-2022
Publisher: Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group)
Citation: Pettican, A. et al. (2023) 'Doing together: reflections on facilitating the co-production of participatory action research with marginalised populations', Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 15 (2), pp. 202 - 219. doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2022.2146164.
Abstract: Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). . Recognising the limited literature detailing the practical application of co-production principles and practices within sport, exercise and health research, critical reflections on co-production principles and practice are shared here, drawing on two participatory action research (PAR) projects in the United Kingdom (UK). Co-production and PAR are distinguished, and their commonalities discussed. Both projects were facilitated by occupational therapists and concerned with health inequities and social justice. The Voices for Inclusive Activity project brought disabled people together online to explore more accessible and inclusive approaches to evaluate disability sport and physical activity. The Positive Mental Attitude project took place with a community-based football league for people with experience of mental distress and explored the nature and value of participation. Both projects involved researching with people who are often excluded from research. Addressing power imbalances can function to engage marginalised people in processes of knowledge production and enable social justice. Co-production offers useful principles that are democratic, inclusive, collaborative, and participatory, but the process is not straightforward. The reflections within this paper focus on the challenges and opportunities the first and second authors faced as facilitators of co-produced research. Participant and co-researcher quotes reveal how participatory methods and approaches address gaps in experiential knowledge of exclusion and marginalisation. The potential for co-produced research to influence policy and practice is outlined.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26778
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2022.2146164
ISSN: 2159-676X
Other Identifiers: ORCID iDs: Anna Pettican https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0818-3767; Beverley Goodman https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3542-7093; Wendy Bryant https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5781-3625; Peter Beresford https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6052-033X; Paul Freeman https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9162-5943; Valerie Gladwell https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0960-4014; Cherry Kilbride https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2045-1883; Ewen Speed https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3850-922X.
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.2.77 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons