Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27475
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPownall, M-
dc.contributor.authorPennington, CR-
dc.contributor.authorNorris, E-
dc.contributor.authorJuanchich, M-
dc.contributor.authorSmailes, D-
dc.contributor.authorRussell, PS-
dc.contributor.authorGooch, D-
dc.contributor.authorEvans, TR-
dc.contributor.authorPersson, S-
dc.contributor.authorMak, MHC-
dc.contributor.authorTzavella, L-
dc.contributor.authorMonk, R-
dc.contributor.authorGough, T-
dc.contributor.authorBenwell, C-
dc.contributor.authorElsherif, MM-
dc.contributor.authorFarran, EK-
dc.contributor.authorGallagher-Mitchell, T-
dc.contributor.authorKendrick, LT-
dc.contributor.authorBahnmueller, J-
dc.contributor.authorNordmann, E-
dc.contributor.authorZaneva, M-
dc.contributor.authorGilligan-Lee, KA-
dc.contributor.authorBazhydai, M-
dc.contributor.authorJones, A-
dc.contributor.authorSedgmond, J-
dc.contributor.authorHolzleitner, IJ-
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, J-
dc.contributor.authorMoss, J-
dc.contributor.authorFarrelly, D-
dc.contributor.authorParker, AJ-
dc.contributor.authorClark, K-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-30T19:44:08Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-30T19:44:08Z-
dc.date.issued2023-12-21-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Madeleine Pownall https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3734-8006-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Charlotte R. Pennington https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5259-642X-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Marie Juanchich https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0241-9529-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Thomas Rhys Evans https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6670-0718-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Rebecca Monk https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3554-9007-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Mahmoud Elsherif https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0540-3998-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Emily Nordmann https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0806-1081-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Mirela Zaneva https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3569-931X-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Adam J. Parker https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1367-2282-
dc.identifier.citationPownall, M. et al. (2023) 'Evaluating the Pedagogical Effectiveness of Study Preregistration in the Undergraduate Dissertation', Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6 (4), pp. 1 - 21. doi: 10.1177/25152459231202724.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27475-
dc.descriptionAcknowledgments: Stage 1 Peer Community in Registered Reports recommendation is available at https://rr.peercommunityin.org/articles/rec?id=48. Stage 2 Peer Community in Registered Reports recommendation is available at https://rr.peercommunityin.org/articles/rec?id=437.-
dc.descriptionA PsyArxiv preprint of this article is available at: under title: Evaluating the pedagogical effectiveness of study preregistration in the undergraduate dissertation: A Registered Report.-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. Research shows that questionable research practices (QRPs) are present in undergraduate final-year dissertation projects. One entry-level Open Science practice proposed to mitigate QRPs is “study preregistration,” through which researchers outline their research questions, design, method, and analysis plans before data collection and/or analysis. In this study, we aimed to empirically test the effectiveness of preregistration as a pedagogic tool in undergraduate dissertations using a quasi-experimental design. A total of 89 UK psychology students were recruited, including students who preregistered their empirical quantitative dissertation (n = 52; experimental group) and students who did not (n = 37; control group). Attitudes toward statistics, acceptance of QRPs, and perceived understanding of Open Science were measured both before and after dissertation completion. Exploratory measures included capability, opportunity, and motivation to engage with preregistration, measured at Time 1 only. This study was conducted as a Registered Report; Stage 1 protocol: https://osf.io/9hjbw (date of in-principle acceptance: September 21, 2021). Study preregistration did not significantly affect attitudes toward statistics or acceptance of QRPs. However, students who preregistered reported greater perceived understanding of Open Science concepts from Time 1 to Time 2 compared with students who did not preregister. Exploratory analyses indicated that students who preregistered reported significantly greater capability, opportunity, and motivation to preregister. Qualitative responses revealed that preregistration was perceived to improve clarity and organization of the dissertation, prevent QRPs, and promote rigor. Disadvantages and barriers included time, perceived rigidity, and need for training. These results contribute to discussions surrounding embedding Open Science principles into research training.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 21-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. Rights and permissions: Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/-
dc.subjectpreregistrationen_US
dc.subjectopen scienceen_US
dc.subjectreproducibilityen_US
dc.subjectundergraduate trainingen_US
dc.subjectdissertationsen_US
dc.subjectresearch trainingen_US
dc.titleEvaluating the Pedagogical Effectiveness of Study Preregistration in the Undergraduate Dissertationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231202724-
pubs.issue4-
pubs.volume6-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. Rights and permissions: Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).560.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons