Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27817
Title: The Effect of Rear Bicycle Light Configurations on Drivers’ Perception of Cyclists’ Presence and Proximity
Authors: Bishop, D
Waheed, H
Dkaidek, T
Broadbent, D
Keywords: collision;cycle;safety;smart technology;vulnerable road user
Issue Date: 5-Jan-2024
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Bishop, D. et al. (2023) 'The Effect of Rear Bicycle Light Configurations on Drivers’ Perception of Cyclists’ Presence and Proximity', Accident Analysis and Prevention, 197, 107418, pp. 1 - 11. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107418,
Abstract: Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). The optimal cycle light configuration for maximizing cyclists’ conspicuity to drivers is not clear. Advances in sensor technology has led to the development of ‘reactive’ cycle lights that detect changes in the environment and consequently increase their flashing speed and brightness in risky situations – for example, when a rearward car is approaching – but no research has examined the effect of such lights on driver perception. The aim of the present study is to compare different cycle light configurations, including ‘reactive’ light technology, on drivers’ ability to detect cyclists and estimate their proximity. We recruited 32 drivers to participate in two experiments, in which they viewed life-size real-world stimuli filmed from a driver’s perspective in daytime and at dusk. The footage showed a cyclist on a bicycle with a rear light mounted on the seat post, in various configurations: static light, steady flashing, reactive flashing and no light. In Experiment 1, the drivers were required to detect the presence or absence of a cyclist on the road ahead as quickly as possible. In Experiment 2, they were required to estimate the distance of the cyclist from their vehicle, and to rate their confidence in their estimates. Experiment 1 revealed that drivers were quicker to detect the cyclist’s presence in all rear cycle light conditions relative to the no light condition, but there were no differences in speed or accuracy across rear light conditions. Experiment 2 showed that drivers were more accurate in estimating the cyclist’s proximity in the steady flashing and reactive flashing conditions, compared to static and no light conditions. Drivers were also more confident in their judgements in all rear light conditions compared to the no light condition. In conclusion, flashing rear cycle lights, regardless of reactive technology, enhanced drivers’ perception of a cyclist ahead, notably in terms of their judgements of distance to that cyclist. Further investigation is needed to fully understand the impact of cycle light technology on driver perception, as well as the use of drivers’ distance-to-cyclist estimates as an index of cyclists’ cognitive conspicuity.
Description: Data availability: Data will be made available on request.
Supplementary data (5 videos) are available online at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457523004657#s0185 .
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27817
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107418
ISSN: 0001-4575
Other Identifiers: ORCID iD: Daniel Bishop https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7537-8559
ORCID iD: David Broadbent https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5096-6522
107418
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).5.42 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons