Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27916
Title: The development and internal pilot trial of a digital physical activity and emotional well-being intervention (Kidney BEAM) for people with chronic kidney disease
Authors: Young, HML
Castle, EM
Briggs, J
Walklin, C
Billany, RE
Asgari, E
Bhandari, S
Bishop, N
Bramham, K
Burton, JO
Campbell, J
Chilcot, J
Cooper, N
Deelchand, V
Graham-Brown, MPM
Haggis, L
Hamilton, A
Jesky, M
Kalra, PA
Koufaki, P
Macdonald, J
McCafferty, K
Nixon, AC
Noble, H
Saynor, ZL
Taal, MW
Tollitt, J
Wheeler, DC
Wilkinson, TJ
Greenwood, SA
Keywords: digital health;mixed-methods;e-health;telemedicine;remote trial
Issue Date: 6-Jan-2024
Publisher: Springer Nature
Citation: Young, H.M.L. et al. (2024) 'The development and internal pilot trial of a digital physical activity and emotional well-being intervention (Kidney BEAM) for people with chronic kidney disease', Scientific Reports, 14, 700, pp. 1 - 21. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50507-4.
Abstract: Copyright © The Author(s) 2024. This trial assessed the feasibility and acceptability of Kidney BEAM, a physical activity and emotional well-being self-management digital health intervention (DHI) for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which offers live and on-demand physical activity sessions, educational blogs and videos, and peer support. In this mixed-methods, multicentre randomised waitlist-controlled internal pilot, adults with established CKD were recruited from five NHS hospitals and randomised 1:1 to Kidney BEAM or waitlist control. Feasibility outcomes were based upon a priori progression criteria. Acceptability was primarily explored via individual semi-structured interviews (n = 15). Of 763 individuals screened, n = 519 (68%, 95% CI 65 to 71%) were eligible. Of those eligible, n = 303 (58%, 95% CI 54–63%) did not respond to an invitation to participate by the end of the pilot period. Of the 216 responders, 50 (23%, 95% CI 18–29%) consented. Of the 42 randomised, n = 22 (10 (45%) male; 49 ± 16 years; 14 (64%) White British) were allocated to Kidney BEAM and n = 20 (12 (55%) male; 56 ± 11 years; 15 (68%) White British) to the waitlist control group. Overall, n = 15 (30%, 95% CI 18–45%) withdrew during the pilot phase. Participants completed a median of 14 (IQR 5–21) sessions. At baseline, 90–100% of outcome data (patient reported outcome measures and a remotely conducted physical function test) were completed and 62–83% completed at 12 weeks follow-up. Interview data revealed that remote trial procedures were acceptable. Participants’ reported that Kidney BEAM increased their opportunity and motivation to be physically active, however, lack of time remained an ongoing barrier to engagement with the DHI. An randomised controlled trial of Kidney BEAM is feasible and acceptable, with adaptations to increase recruitment, retention and engagement.
Description: Availability of data and materials: The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Trial registration NCT04872933. Date of first registration 05/05/2021.
Supplementary Information is available online at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1038/s41598-023-50507-4#Sec48 .
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27916
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50507-4
Other Identifiers: ORCID iD: Ellen M Castle https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6961-6108
700
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2024. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.1.41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons