Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28219
Title: Mechanical and GWP assessment of concrete using Blast Furnace Slag, Silica Fume and recycled aggregate
Authors: Shamass, R
Rispoli, O
Limbachiya, V
Kovacs, R
Keywords: binary cementitious;cement replacement;life-cycle analysis;recycled concrete aggregates
Issue Date: 24-May-2023
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Shamass, R. et al. (2023) 'Mechanical and GWP assessment of concrete using Blast Furnace Slag, Silica Fume and recycled aggregate', Case Studies in Construction Materials, 18, e02164, pp. 1 - 15. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02164.
Abstract: Demolition waste and cement production is responsible for 36 % of total waste produced on earth and 8 % of the worlds CO2 emissions, respectively. Due to limited research on concrete mixes containing ternary cementitious mixes (Ground Granulated Blast-furnace Slag (GGBS) and Silica Fume (SF)) and demolition waste, the paper reviewed the mechanical properties of concrete, and structural performance of reinforced beams. Thereafter, life cycle analysis (LCA) was investigated to understand the true environmental impact, focusing on Global Warming Potential (GWP). Results show that recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) had no significant negative impact on the compressive strength, tensile strength, and modulus of rupture of concrete. The inclusion of GGBS and SF in mixes containing RCA eliminated any negative impact and for all mixes produced greater strengths in comparison to the control mix, due to the secondary reaction of Ca (OH)2 and pore refinement. The flexural behaviour of the concrete beams with 0 %, 25 %, 50 % and 100 % RCA, 25 % GGBS and 5 % SF is similar. LCA results showed that replacing NA with 25 %, 50 % or 100 % RCA has no significant impact on the GWP emissions. This is because of the similar emissions associated with manufacturing and processing of recycled and natural aggregates. However, replacing cement with 5 % SF and 25 % GGBS improves the GWP environmental response of concrete significantly. Additionally, natural aggregates have a higher GWP contribution than that of recycled concrete aggregates by almost 80 % since the process of NA required quarry operation and transportation while the RCA are produced on site from an existing building waste.
Description: Data Availability: Data will be made available on request.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28219
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02164
Other Identifiers: ORCID iD: Rabee Shamass https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7990-8227
e02164
Appears in Collections:Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).7.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons