Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28471
Title: Survival following lung volume reduction procedures: results from the UK Lung Volume Reduction (UKLVR) registry
Authors: Buttery, SC
Lewis, A
Alzetani, A
Bolton, CE
Curtis, KJ
Dodd, JW
Habib, AM
Hussain, A
Havelock, T
Jordan, S
Kallis, C
Kemp, SV
Kirk, A
Lawson, RA
Mahadeva, R
Munavvar, M
Naidu, B
Rathinam, S
Shackcloth, M
Shah, PL
Tenconi, S
Hopkinson, NS
Issue Date: 29-Feb-2024
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Citation: Buttery, S.C. et al. (2024) 'Survival following lung volume reduction procedures: results from the UK Lung Volume Reduction (UKLVR) registry', BMJ Open Respiratory Research, 11 (1), e002092, pp. 1 - 10 (+ 9 pp. of supplementary materials). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002092.
Abstract: Introduction: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and endobronchial valve (EBV) placement can produce substantial benefits in appropriately selected people with emphysema. The UK Lung Volume Reduction (UKLVR) registry is a national multicentre observational study set up to support quality standards and assess outcomes from LVR procedures at specialist centres across the UK. Methods: Data were analysed for all patients undergoing an LVR procedure (LVRS/EBV) who were recruited into the study at participating centres between January 2017 and June 2022, including; disease severity and risk assessment, compliance with guidelines for selection, procedural complications and survival to February 2023. Results: Data on 541 patients from 14 participating centres were analysed. Baseline disease severity was similar in patients who had surgery n=244 (44.9%), or EBV placement n=219 (40.9%), for example, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 32.1 (12.1)% vs 31.2 (11.6)%. 89% of cases had discussion at a multidisciplinary meeting recorded. Median (IQR) length of stay postprocedure for LVRS and EBVs was 12 (13) vs 4 (4) days(p=0.01). Increasing age, male gender and lower FEV1%predicted were associated with mortality risk, but survival did not differ between the two procedures, with 50 (10.8%) deaths during follow-up in the LVRS group vs 45 (9.7%) following EBVs (adjusted HR 1.10 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.67) p=0.661) Conclusion: Based on data entered in the UKLVR registry, LVRS and EBV procedures for emphysema are being performed in people with similar disease severity and long-term survival is similar in both groups.
Description: Data availability statement: Data are available on reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.
Supplementary materials: Supplementary Data are available online at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002092 and are included on a file archived on this institutional repository
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28471
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002092
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: S C Buttery https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9410-414X
ORCiD: Adam Lewis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-8823
ORCiD: A Alzetani https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3373-6714
ORCiD: C E Bolton https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9578-2249
ORCiD: A M Habib https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9919-1131
ORCiD: N S Hopkinson https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3235-0454
e002092
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.801.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
FullTextWithSupplementaryMaterials.pdfCopyright information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.1.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons