Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30085
Title: | Regional cerebral blood flow as predictor of response to occipital nerve block in cluster headache |
Authors: | Medina, S Bakar, NA O’Daly, O Miller, S Makovac, E Renton, T Williams, SCR Matharu, M Howard, MA |
Keywords: | cluster headache;greater occipital nerve block;regional cerebral blood flow;arterial spin labelling;trigeminal cephalgia |
Issue Date: | 12-Aug-2021 |
Publisher: | BioMed Central (part of Springer Nature) |
Citation: | Medina, S. et al. (2024) 'Regional cerebral blood flow as predictor of response to occipital nerve block in cluster headache', Journal of Headache and Pain, 22 (1), 91, pp. 1 - 14. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01304-9. |
Abstract: | Background: Cluster headache is an excruciating disorder with no cure. Greater occipital nerve blockades can transiently suppress attacks in approximately 50% of patients, however, its mechanism of action remains uncertain, and there are no reliable predictors of treatment response. To address this, we investigated the effect of occipital nerve blockade on regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), an index of brain activity, and differences between treatment responders and non-responders. Finally, we compared baseline perfusion maps from patients to a matched group of healthy controls. Methods: 21 male, treatment-naive patients were recruited while in a cluster headache bout. During a pain-free phase between headaches, patients underwent pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelled MRI assessments to provide quantitative indices of rCBF. MRIs were performed prior to and 7-to-21 days following treatment. Patients also recorded the frequency of their headache attacks in a daily paper diary. Neuropsychological assessment including anxiety, depression and quality of life measures was performed in a first, scanning free session for each patient. Results: Following treatment, patients demonstrated relative rCBF reductions in posterior temporal gyrus, cerebellum and caudate, and rCBF increases in occipital cortex. Responders demonstrated relative rCBF increases, compared to non-responders, in medial prefrontal cortex and lateral occipital cortex at baseline, but relative reductions in cingulate and middle temporal cortices. rCBF was increased in patients compared to healthy controls in cerebellum and hippocampus, but reduced in orbitofrontal cortex, insula and middle temporal gyrus. Conclusions: We provide new mechanistic insights regarding the aetiology of cluster headache, the mechanisms of action of occipital nerve blockades and potential predictors of treatment response. Future investigation should determine whether observed effects are reproducible and extend to other headache disorders. |
Description: | Availability of data and materials: All data were acquired at the Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences at King’s College London. Composite groupwise statistical maps derived study analyses are available from the corresponding author SM on reasonable request. |
URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30085 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01304-9 |
ISSN: | 1129-2369 |
Other Identifiers: | ORCiD: Sonia Medina https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8883-6520 ORCiD: Elena Makovac 91 |
Appears in Collections: | Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | Copyright © The Author(s). 2021. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. | 3.17 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License