Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30334
Title: | A physiotherapist-led biopsychosocial education and exercise programme for patients with chronic low back pain in Ghana: a mixed-methods feasibility study |
Authors: | Ampiah, PK Hendrick, P Moffatt, F Ampiah, JA |
Keywords: | physiotherapy;biopsychosocial;exercise;patient education;feasibility;mixed-methods |
Issue Date: | 18-Dec-2024 |
Publisher: | BioMed Central (part of Springer Nature) |
Citation: | Ampiah, P.K. et al. (2024) 'A physiotherapist-led biopsychosocial education and exercise programme for patients with chronic low back pain in Ghana: a mixed-methods feasibility study',. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 0 (accepted, in press), pp. 1 - [20]. |
Abstract: | Background: Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal condition which causes substantial disability globally. The biopsychosocial model of management has been recommended in national and international guidelines for the management of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, biopsychosocial approaches are predominantly delivered in high income countries (HICs), although the prevalence of LBP is substantially higher in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) especially in Africa (39%; 95% CI 30–47). Understanding the effectiveness of BPS interventions in LMICs especially in Africa is underexplored, with substantial inequity between research from HICs and LMICs. Ghana is a LMIC where the effectiveness of biopsychosocial interventions has been underexplored. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of delivering a physiotherapist-led BPS programme for the management of patients with CLBP in Ghana. Methods: This was a mixed-methods, sequential, pretest-posttest feasibility study. Participants involved thirty patients with CLBP. The biopsychosocial intervention involved an exercise and patient education programme based on principles of cognitive behavioural strategies with emphasis on self-management. The biopsychosocial intervention was delivered for six weeks for each participant. Feasibility outcomes regarding management and processes were captured pre-intervention, post-intervention, and three-months post intervention. Semi-structured interviews were conducted post-intervention to explore participants’ experiences with the biopsychosocial intervention. Patients’ demographics were collected at baseline. Patient reported outcome measures such as intensity of pain, disability, pain catastrophising, kinesiophobia, self-efficacy, and general quality of life, were collected pre-intervention, post-intervention and at three-months follow-up. Qualitative analysis explored participants’ experiences regarding the acceptability of the biopsychosocial intervention. Results: The results of this feasibility study demonstrated that the training programme was acceptable to physiotherapists. Recruitment rate (5 patient participants per week − 100% recruitment met), retention rate post-intervention (90%), data completion rate post-intervention (99.8%) and intervention fidelity (83.1%), all met feasibility thresholds. There were no adverse events. Qualitative data also demonstrated that the biopsychosocial intervention was acceptable to participants. Conclusion: This study has established the potential to deliver a biopsychosocial intervention programme in a Ghanaian hospital setting. This biopsychosocial intervention therefore shows promise, and the result of the study provides a platform to develop future clinical studies. |
Description: | Data availability:
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the University of Nottingham, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of University of Nottingham, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee. Electronic supplementary material is available online at: https://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12891-024-08118-1#Sec34 . |
URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30334 |
ISSN: | 1471-2474 |
Other Identifiers: | ORCiD: Paapa Kwesi Ampiah https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9219-9154 1014 |
Appears in Collections: | Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | Copyright © The Author(s) 2024. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | 2.89 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License