Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30520
Title: | Does unemployment worsen babies’ health? A tale of siblings, maternal behaviour, and selection: Does unemployment worsen babies’ health? |
Authors: | De Cao, E McCormick, B Nicodemo, C |
Keywords: | unemployment rate;birth outcomes;birthweight;fertility;England |
Issue Date: | 21-Feb-2022 |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Citation: | De Cao, E., McCormick, B. and Nicodemo, C. (2022) 'Does unemployment worsen babies’ health? A tale of siblings, maternal behaviour, and selection: Does unemployment worsen babies’ health?', Journal of Health Economics, 83, 102601, pp. 1 - 24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102601. |
Abstract: | We study in-utero exposure to economic fluctuations on birth outcomes by exploiting geographical variation in the unemployment rate across local areas in England, and by comparing siblings born to the same mother. Using rich individual data from hospital administrative records for 2003–2012, babies’ health is found to be strongly pro-cyclical. This overall result masks marked differences between babies born in the most affluent areas whose health at birth improves in a recession, and babies born in the average-to-lowest income deprived areas whose health deteriorates. Maternal alcohol consumption, smoking, and delay in the first antenatal care assessment - combined with parental income loss, are found to drive the results. While differences in maternal risky behaviours can explain the heterogenous effects. |
Description: | JEL classification:
E24; I10; I12; J13. Highlights: • We study the effect of unemployment on birth outcomes in England. • We exploit geographical variation in the unemployment rate across local areas and we compare siblings born to the same mother via sibling fixed effects. • We find babies' health to be strongly pro-cyclical. • The greatest adverse effects are concentrated among the average to the lowest socioeconomic status families. • Unhealthy maternal behaviour - alcohol consumption, smoking, and delay in the first antenatal care assessment - combined with parental income loss, appear to drive the results. |
URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30520 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102601 |
ISSN: | 0167-6296 |
Other Identifiers: | ORCiD: Catia Nicodemo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5490-9576 102601 |
Appears in Collections: | Brunel Business School Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) | 1.63 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License