Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30942
Title: | Physician associate (PA) students’ perceptions of team-based learning (TBL) for teaching in Geriatric medicine |
Authors: | Aweid, B Parnis, N Harrison, D |
Keywords: | physician associate;physician assistants;team-based learning;geriatrics |
Issue Date: | 3-Feb-2025 |
Publisher: | BioMed Central (part of Springer Nature) |
Citation: | Aweid, B., Parnis, N. and Harrison, D. (2025) 'Physician associate (PA) students’ perceptions of team-based learning (TBL) for teaching in Geriatric medicine', BMC Medical Education, 25, 173, pp. 1 - 8. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06787-7. |
Abstract: | Background: Physician Associates have recently been introduced to the UK healthcare workforce. Their curriculum includes important topics in Geriatric medicine. As they undertake a 2-year intensive postgraduate course we wanted to explore if Team-based Learning is an effective and efficient learning strategy. In addition, we wanted to know how this approach compares to their current learning methods, namely Problem-based learning and lectures. Methods: This was a qualitative study of Physician associate student perceptions of Team-Based Learning. After introducing four TBL sessions in the specialty of Geriatric medicine we sent students anonymous questionnaires asking them about their TBL experience and how it compared to PBL and lectures. We then undertook a thematic analysis of the responses. Results: Twenty students responded to our online questionnaire. The thematic analysis utilised themes from previous studies as well as emergent ones. The key themes were that TBL requires more preparation, TBL is effective, TBL is preferred to PBL and lectures, but students did not want TBL to replace all their teaching. Conclusions: TBL is an effective learning strategy that can be used alongside other teaching methods. While Physician Associate students preferred TBL over PBL and lectures, they wanted to have TBL alongside lectures at least. This information is important when planning teaching for an intensive 2-year course. |
Description: | Data availability:
The survey results are provided within the supplementary material section (Supplementary material, Figure S2). Supplementary Information is available online at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-025-06787-7#Sec15 . |
URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30942 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06787-7 |
Other Identifiers: | Article no. 173 |
Appears in Collections: | Brunel Medical School Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | Copyright © The Author(s) 2025. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | 1.73 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License