Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32496
Title: Contributions of having a pet to living well with dementia over time: Longitudinal findings from the IDEAL cohort
Authors: Opdebeeck, C
Gamble, LD
Martyr, A
Rippon, I
Thom, JM
Victor, C
Clare, L
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease;neurodegenerative;companion animals;animal care;human-animal interaction
Issue Date: 29-Dec-2025
Publisher: Routledge (Taylor and Francis Group)
Citation: Opdebeeck, C. et al. (2025) 'Contributions of having a pet to living well with dementia over time: Longitudinal findings from the IDEAL cohort', Aging and Mental Health, 0 (ahead of print), pp. 1 - 11. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2025.2606883.
Abstract: Objectives: Pets may be beneficial for people living with dementia but understanding of longitudinal benefits is limited. This study investigated whether having a pet was associated with differences over time in ‘living well’, cognition, functional ability, depression or loneliness. Method: This study utilised 3 assessment timepoints from the IDEAL Programme, a longitudinal cohort study of people with mild-to-moderate dementia. The relationships between having a pet, a dog, and caring for a pet (vs no pet/no dog/not caring) and outcome changes were assessed using mixed effects models with data from 1,532 people with dementia at baseline, 1,173 at 12-months and 846 people at 24 months. Results: People with dementia with a pet had slower decline in informant-rated well-being, satisfaction with life, and self-rated functional ability over time than those with no pet. Those with a dog had slower decline in self-rated quality of life and functional ability, cognitive function, and informant-rated well-being and functional ability than those with a different pet or no pet. Conclusion: Having a pet may be beneficial for people living with dementia, with dogs offering additional benefits. Enabling people living with dementia to have a pet could help them maintain their independence and ability to live well for longer.
Description: Data availability statement: IDEAL data were deposited with the UK Data Archive in April 2020. Details of how the data can be accessed can be found here: https://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/854293/.
For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising.
Supplemental data for this article are available online at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13607863.2025.2606883# .
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32496
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2025.2606883
ISSN: 1360-7863
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Carol Opdebeeck https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0402-0984
ORCiD: Laura D. Gamble https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8496-9705
ORCiD: Anthony Martyr https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1702-8902
ORCiD: Isla Rippon https://orcid.org.0000-0002-9743-2592
ORCiD: Jeanette M. Thom https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6575-3711
ORCiD: Christina Victor https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4213-3974
ORCiD: Linda Clare https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3989-5318
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.1.79 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons