Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/4141
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCerioni, L-
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-26T15:10:34Z-
dc.date.available2010-02-26T15:10:34Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/4141-
dc.description.abstractThis article discusses whether, in light of the developments of the ECJ case-law in different areas, and in particular in the areas of EU company law and EU tax law, it is possible to identify a unitary concept of “abuse of rights” in EU law, and whether the prohibition of abuse of right based on such concept has reached the status of “general principle” of EU law. Through a re-reading of the ECJ case-law, it is argued that it is possible to identify a unitary concept of abuse of rights, and that the prohibition of abuse of rights could be described in terms of a “general principle with a sui generis aspect”, which general principle, in the author’s view, should be seen as complementary to the prohibition of abuse of rights spelt out in Art. 54 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights for consistency of the (post-Lisbon Treaty) EU legal order.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectEU company lawen
dc.subjectEU tax lawen
dc.titleThe “abuse of right” in EU company law and EU tax law: A re-reading of the ECJ case-law and the quest for a unitary notionen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Law
Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Law.pdf297.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.