Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5130
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavis, EP-
dc.contributor.authorKarim, D-
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-16T09:04:50Z-
dc.date.available2011-05-16T09:04:50Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationEconomics and Finance Working Paper, Brunel University, 08-27en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5130-
dc.description.abstractOne of the features of the sub-prime crisis, that began in August 2007, was its unexpected nature. It came as a surprise not only to most financial market participants but also in some degree to the policy community. In this context, we seek to assess whether early warning systems based on the logit and binomial tree approaches on the UK and US economies could have helped to warn about the crisis. We also consider a “check list approach” of indicators based on history. Although not all of the complementary approaches are successful, we contend that our work suggests that a broadening of approaches of macroprudential analysis is appropriate.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBrunel Universityen_US
dc.subjectSub prime crisisen_US
dc.subjectEarly warningen_US
dc.subjectFinancial instabilityen_US
dc.subjectMacroprudential analysisen_US
dc.titleCould early warning systems have helped to predict the sub prime crisis?en_US
dc.typeResearch Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:Economics and Finance
Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
0827.pdf370.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.