Living in the same household - ‘Incest’ in the family of sport

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/540

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Brackenridge, CH	-
dc.contributor.author	Williams, Y	-
dc.coverage.spatial	6	en
dc.date.accessioned	2007-01-16T17:47:46Z	-
dc.date.available	2007-01-16T17:47:46Z	-
dc.date.issued	2004	-
dc.identifier.citation	New Law Journal 6: 179-180, Feb 2004	en
dc.identifier.issn	0306-6479	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/540	-
dc.description.abstract	This article focuses on the coach/athlete relationship in the self admitted sporting ‘family’ and, using both the provisions of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and the civil law remedies of non-molestation orders argues that where matters of abuse are concerned, the private world of the surrogate family of sport could be just as liable under family law principles as any other modern day informal family.	en
dc.format.extent	37376 bytes	-
dc.format.mimetype	application/msword	-
dc.language.iso	en	-
dc.publisher	Reed Elsevier	en
dc.subject	Law	en
dc.subject	Sport	-
dc.subject	Child protection	-
dc.title	Living in the same household - ‘Incest’ in the family of sport	en
dc.type	Research Paper	en
Appears in Collections:	Sport Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
New Law Journal (13 1 04).pdf		27.66 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open