Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5664
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dowding, KM | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-07-28T13:15:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-07-28T13:15:47Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1990 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | School of Social Sciences, Department of Government, Working Paper No. 10, 1990 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 1-872166-70-9 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5664 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Peter Morriss's logical ability/ableness distinction breaks down under analysis but a similar normative distinction is important for understanding power and liberty. The breakdown is demonstrated under the test case of the power of a pivotal voter in a committee. Brian Barry argues that a pivotal voter has power as ableness not ability, but the paper demonstrates that a pivotal voter has neither. Under standard measures the 'power' of the pivot is due to the chance ordering of all committee members' preference schedules. Rather than power, each has a resource which, when certain conditions obtain, can be powerfully utilized. The power of the pivot depends upon the realization that those conditions obtain thus the power index literature requires modification. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Brunel University | - |
dc.title | Ableness and ability: Morriss on power and counteractuals | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | The Brunel Collection Brunel Law School Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fulltext.pdf | 2.05 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.