Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5711
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, G-
dc.contributor.authorCassell, JA-
dc.contributor.authorPeacock, JL-
dc.contributor.authorColeman, MP-
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-29T15:10:36Z-
dc.date.available2011-07-29T15:10:36Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Medical Journal 332(7549): 1068 - 1070, May 2006en_US
dc.identifier.issn0959-8146-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5711-
dc.descriptionThis article has been made available through the Brunel Open Access Publishing Fund and is available from the specified link - Copyright @ 2006, BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives To describe the views of the British public on the use of personal medical data by the National Cancer Registry without individual consent, and to assess the relative importance attached by the public to personal privacy in relation to public health uses of identifiable health data.Design Cross sectional, face to face interview survey.Setting England, Wales, and Scotland.Participants 2872 respondents, 97% of those who took part in the Office for National Statistics' omnibus survey, a national multistage probability sample in March and April 2005 (response rates 62% and 69%, respectively).Results 72% (95% confidence interval 70% to 74%) of all respondents did not consider any of the following to be an invasion of their privacy by the National Cancer Registry: inclusion of postcode, inclusion of name and address, and the receipt of a letter inviting them to a research study on the basis of inclusion in the registry. Only 2% (2% to 3%) of the sample considered all of these to amount to an invasion of privacy. Logistic regression analysis showed that the proportions not concerned about invasion of privacy varied significantly by country, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and housing tenure, although in all subgroups examined most respondents had no concerns. 81% (79% to 83%) of all respondents said that they would support a law making cancer registration statutory.Conclusions Most of the British public considers the confidential use of personal, identifiable patient information by the National Cancer Registry for the purposes of public health research and surveillance not to be an invasion of privacy.en_US
dc.languageEN-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.titleNational survey of British public's views on use of identifiable medical data by the National Cancer Registryen_US
dc.typeResearch Paperen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38805.473738.7C-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel (Active)-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel (Active)/School of Health Science & Social Care-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Research Centres-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Research Centres/CEHSR-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/School of Health Sciences and Social Care-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/School of Health Sciences and Social Care/CEHSR-
Appears in Collections:Ergonomics
Community Health and Public Health
Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Notice.pdf22.3 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.