Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/6355
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchuster, C-
dc.contributor.authorButler, J-
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, B-
dc.contributor.authorKischka, U-
dc.contributor.authorEttlin, T-
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-11T11:24:49Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-11T11:24:49Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationTrials, 13:11, 23 Jan 2012en_US
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3316146/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.trialsjournal.com/content/13/1/11en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/6355-
dc.descriptionCopyright @ 2012 Schuster et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Motor imagery (MI) when combined with physiotherapy can offer functional benefits after stroke. Two MI integration strategies exist: added and embedded MI. Both approaches were compared when learning a complex motor task (MT): ‘Going down, laying on the floor, and getting up again’. Methods: Outpatients after first stroke participated in a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial with MI embedded into physiotherapy (EG1), MI added to physiotherapy (EG2), and a control group (CG). All groups participated in six physiotherapy sessions. Primary study outcome was time (sec) to perform the motor task at pre and post-intervention. Secondary outcomes: level of help needed, stages of MT-completion, independence, balance, fear of falling (FOF), MI ability. Data were collected four times: twice during one week baseline phase (BL, T0), following the two week intervention (T1), after a two week follow-up (FU). Analysis of variance was performed. Results: Thirty nine outpatients were included (12 females, age: 63.4 ± 10 years; time since stroke: 3.5 ± 2 years; 29 with an ischemic event). All were able to complete the motor task using the standardised 7-step procedure and reduced FOF at T0, T1, and FU. Times to perform the MT at baseline were 44.2 ± 22s, 64.6 ± 50s, and 118.3 ± 93s for EG1 (N = 13), EG2 (N = 12), and CG (N = 14). All groups showed significant improvement in time to complete the MT (p < 0.001) and degree of help needed to perform the task: minimal assistance to supervision (CG) and independent performance (EG1+2). No between group differences were found. Only EG1 demonstrated changes in MI ability over time with the visual indicator increasing from T0 to T1 and decreasing from T1 to FU. The kinaesthetic indicator increased from T1 to FU. Patients indicated to value the MI training and continued using MI for other difficult-to-perform tasks. Conclusions: Embedded or added MI training combined with physiotherapy seem to be feasible and benefi-cial to learn the MT with emphasis on getting up independently. Based on their baseline level CG had the highest potential to improve outcomes. A patient study with 35 patients per group could give a conclusive answer of a superior MI integration strategy.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research project was partially funded by the Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation.en_US
dc.languageen-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.subjectMotor imagery (MI)en_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.subjectPhysiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectMovementen_US
dc.titleComparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: Results of a randomised controlled pilot trialen_US
dc.typeResearch Paperen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-11-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/Brunel Institute for Bioengineering-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/Brunel Institute for Bioengineering/BIB-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Institute for Bioengineering (BIB)
Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf4.1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.