Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/6914
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTakian, A-
dc.contributor.authorPetrakaki, D-
dc.contributor.authorCornford, T-
dc.contributor.authorSheikh, A-
dc.contributor.authorBarber, N-
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-08T12:03:46Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-08T12:03:46Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research, 12(105), 2012en_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/12/105/abstracten
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/6914-
dc.descriptionCopyright @ 2012 Takian et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This article is available through the Brunel Open Access Publishing Fund.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: A commitment to Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems now constitutes a core part of many governments' healthcare reform strategies. The resulting politically-initiated largescale or national EHR endeavors are challenging because of their ambitious agendas of change, the scale of resources needed to make them work, the (relatively) short timescales set, and the large number of stakeholders involved, all of whom pursue somewhat different interests. These initiatives need to be evaluated to establish if they improve care and represent value for money. Methods: Critical reflections on these complexities in the light of experience of undertaking the first national, longitudinal, and sociotechnical evaluation of the implementation and adoption of England's National Health Service's Care Records Service (NHS CRS). Results/discussion: We advance two key arguments. First, national programs for EHR implementations are likely to take place in the shifting sands of evolving sociopolitical and sociotechnical and contexts, which are likely to shape them in significant ways. This poses challenges to conventional evaluation approaches which draw on a model of baseline operations intervention changed operations (outcome). Second, evaluation of such programs must account for this changing context by adapting to it. This requires careful and creative choice of ontological, epistemological and methodological assumptions. Summary: New and significant challenges are faced in evaluating national EHR implementation endeavors. Based on experiences from this national evaluation of the implementation and adoption of the NHS CRS in England, we argue for an approach to these evaluations which moves away from seeing EHR systems as Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) projects requiring an essentially outcome-centred assessment towards a more interpretive approach that reflects the situated and evolving nature of EHR seen within multiple specific settings and reflecting a constantly changing milieu of policies, strategies and software, with constant interactions across such boundaries.en_US
dc.languageENG-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.subjectElectronic health record (EHR)en_US
dc.subjectEvaluationen_US
dc.subjectMethodologyen_US
dc.subjectSociotechnicalen_US
dc.subjectChangingen_US
dc.subjectNHS CRSen_US
dc.subjectAdaptationen_US
dc.subjectReflexivityen_US
dc.titleBuilding a house on shifting sand: methodological considerations when evaluating the implementation and adoption of national electronic health record systems.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-105-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Health Sciences & Social Care-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Health Sciences & Social Care/Health-
Appears in Collections:Publications
Community Health and Public Health
Brunel OA Publishing Fund
Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf502.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.