Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/950
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGregoriou, A-
dc.contributor.authorIoannidis, C-
dc.coverage.spatial30en
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-05T12:39:19Z-
dc.date.available2007-07-05T12:39:19Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.citationEconomics and Finance Working papers, Brunel University, 03-02en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/950-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we examine effect on the returns of firms that have been included to and deleted from the FTSE 100 over the time period of 1984-2001. Like the S&P 500 listing studies, we find that the price and trading volume of newly listed (deleted) firms increases (decreases). The evidence is consistent with the information cost/liquidity explanation. This is because investors hold stocks with more (less) available information, consequently implying that they have lower (higher) trading costs. This explains the increase (decrease) in the stock price and trading volume of newly listed (deleted) stocks to (from) the FTSE 100 List.en
dc.format.extent207132 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBrunel Universityen
dc.subjectInformation Costs, Trading Costs, Bid-Ask Spreads, Liquidityen
dc.titleLiquidity effects due to information costs from changesen
dc.typeResearch Paperen
Appears in Collections:Economics and Finance
Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
03-02.pdf202.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.