<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>BURA Collection:</title>
    <link>http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32859</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 03:02:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-07-02T03:02:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BRAID Researchers’ Response to the call for contributions on artificial intelligence and creativity issued by the UN Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights, Alexandra Xanthaki</title>
      <link>http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33474</link>
      <description>Title: BRAID Researchers’ Response to the call for contributions on artificial intelligence and creativity issued by the UN Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights, Alexandra Xanthaki
Authors: Miltner, K; Moruzzi, C; Parker, M; Potapov, K; Sichani, A-M; Westenberger, P
Abstract: This response to the call for contributions on artificial intelligence and creativity issued by the UN Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights, Alexandra Xanthaki, was prepared by researchers in the Bridging Responsible AI Divides (BRAID) Programme.
Description: BRAID is a UK-wide programme dedicated to integrating Arts and Humanities research more fully into&#xD;
the Responsible AI ecosystem, as well as bridging the divides between academic, industry, policy and&#xD;
regulatory work on responsible AI (https://braiduk.org/). We are an interdisciplinary group of researchers in the Bridging Responsible AI Divides (BRAID) Programme. Views are our own and do not reflect those of our institutions, organisations or individuals partnered with us in our projects, the BRAID programme as a whole, or other BRAID researchers.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33474</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-05-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dr Paula Westenberger's response to the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance Consultation - 7 May 2026</title>
      <link>http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33465</link>
      <description>Title: Dr Paula Westenberger's response to the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance Consultation - 7 May 2026
Authors: Westenberger, P
Abstract: This is Dr Paula Westenberger's response submitted on 7 May 2026 to the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance Consultation: https://www.un.org/global-dialogue-ai-governance/en
Description: Dr Paula Westenberger is a Senior Lecturer in Intellectual Property Law at Brunel University of London &amp; Bridging Responsible AI Divides (BRAID) Research Fellow (AHRC funded: Grant number AH/X007146/1). The views expressed in this response are the author's own views as an independent academic, and do not purport to represent those of any cited institutions, organisations, groups or individuals.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33465</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-06-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Post-Human Creativity And The Evaluation Of Intellectual Property Justifications: A Sustainable Development Perspective</title>
      <link>http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33334</link>
      <description>Title: Post-Human Creativity And The Evaluation Of Intellectual Property Justifications: A Sustainable Development Perspective
Authors: Mazzi, F
Abstract: In the age of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI), the foundational justifications for intellectual property (IP) are being strained by the rise of non-human creative agents. Historically grounded in philosophical traditions emphasizing labor, personhood, and social utility, IP law presumes human intention and moral desert as core rationales for granting exclusive rights. However, generative models-capable of producing art, code, literature, and inventions autonomously-challenge these assumptions. This chapter interrogates whether existing human-centric IP justifications remain normatively sound when the "creator" may be an algorithm devoid of consciousness or volition. It argues that this epistemological and ontological shift exposes the need for considering the role of IP theory. This chapter advocates for a normative reappraisal of IP theory in light of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs, with their emphases on inclusive innovation, access to knowledge, climate action, and global equity, offer a values-based framework to assess whether IP rights for AI-generated works support or hinder broader social objectives. By engaging critically with theories of Lockean labor, Hegelian recognition, utilitarianism, and the commons, the paper explores whether post-human creativity calls for a re-evaluation of IP policies reconciled with IP theory. Ultimately, it posits that IP regimes are and have always been evolving to prioritise human flourishing. Rather than asking who owns AI output, the chapter attempts at asking how exclusive rights can serve the public interest in a post-human creative economy. This reorientation-from entitlement to responsibility-may be a turning point to align IP with the challenges of sustainable development in the 21st century.
Description: This is a preprint version of a forthcoming book chapter available online at SSRN, date written: 25 October, 2025. It has not been certified by peer review. It is due to be published by Cambridge University Press in 2026.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33334</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-02-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Comparative Study of Administrative Enforcement of Copyright Protection in China and Europe</title>
      <link>http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33327</link>
      <description>Title: A Comparative Study of Administrative Enforcement of Copyright Protection in China and Europe
Authors: Wang, FF
Abstract: Introduction: Social media platforms are now key spaces for user-generated content and video monetization. AI technology increasingly supports dispute resolution, including internal content claims, notice-and-takedown procedures and ODR services. AI can be applied in civil or criminal enforcement to implement blocking injunctions and facilitate alternative administrative blocking mechanisms. However, questions persist regarding the reliability and legal clarity of AIpowered content moderation tools in these procedures. ...
Description: This paper mainly draws upon the author’s previous publication in JCL: Wang, F (2022) ‘Resolving Online Content Disputes in the age of Artificial Intelligence: Legal and Technological Solutions in comparative perspective’ 17 (2) Journal of Comparative Law 491-517.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33327</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

