Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) >
Schools >
Brunel Law School >
Brunel Law School Research Papers >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1111

Title: Drawing the boundaries of mens rea in the jurisprudence of the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
Authors: Badar, ME
Keywords: Mens rea
Specific intent
Dolus specialis
Terror against the civilian population
Torture
Genocide
Persecution
Direct and indirect intent crimes
Wilful crimes
Wanton crimes
Publication Date: 2006
Publisher: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (Brill)
Citation: International Criminal Law Review. 6(3): 313-348, Sep 2006
Abstract: Even though more than a decade has passed since the creation of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, the law of the most fundamental concept in international criminal law – mens rea - remains unsettled. Through its jurisprudence, the Yugoslavia Tribunal has made enormous efforts to assign different degrees of mens rea for different categories of crimes under its Statute. The present study is an attempt to clarify several issues with regard to the law of mens rea as developed in the case law of the Yugoslavia Tribunal. Among these issues are the following: what precisely is to be understood by the terms “specific intent”, “special intent”, “dolus specialis”, or “surplus intent”? Similarly, what are the precise meanings of the terms “deliberately”, “intention”, “intent”, “intentionally”, “wilful or wilfully”, “knowledge”, and “wanton” as provided for in the ICTY Statute or as employed by the Chambers within its judgments.
URI: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1111
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157181206778553905
ISSN: 1567-536X
Appears in Collections:Law
Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Fulltext.pdf203.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.