Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/14747
Title: Clinical guidelines for low back pain. A critical review of consensus and inconsistencies across three major guidelines.
Authors: O'Connell, NE
Wand, BM
Cook, CE
Ward, SP
Keywords: Low back pain;Clinical Guidelines;Evidence based practice;Implementation
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 2017
Abstract: Given the scale and cost of the problem of low back pain, it is imperative that healthcare professionals involved in the care of people with low back pain have access to up-to-date, evidenced based information to assist them in treatment decision making. Clinical guidelines exist to promote consistent best practice, to reduce unwarranted variation and the use of low value interventions in patient care. Recent decades have seen the publication of a number of such guidelines. In this narrative review we consider three selected international interdisciplinary guidelines for the management of low back pain. Guideline development methods, consistent recommendations and inconsistencies between these guidelines are critically discussed.
URI: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/14747
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2017.05.001
Appears in Collections:Publications
Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.docxFile is Embargoed unti 08/06/201870.04 kBUnknownView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.