Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/15199
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, X-
dc.contributor.authorMa, J-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, H-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-27T11:15:37Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-27T11:15:37Z-
dc.date.issued2017-10-17-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Engine Research, 2017, 19(9) pp. 927 - 940en_US
dc.identifier.issn2041-3149-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/15199-
dc.descriptionThe data of this article can be accessed from the BrunelUniversity London data archive, figshare at https://doi.org/10.17633/rd.brunel.5414059.v1-
dc.description.abstractThe 2-stroke engine has the great potential for aggressive engine downsizing and downspeeding because of its double firing frequency. For a given torque, it is characterized with a lower mean effective pressure and lower peak in-cylinder pressure than a 4-stroke counterpart. In order to explore the potential of 2-stroke cycle whilst avoiding the drawbacks of conventional ported 2-stroke engines, a novel 2-stroke Boosted Uniflow Scavenged Direct Injection Gasoline (BUSDIG) engine was proposed and designed. In order to achieve the stable lean-burn combustion in the BUSDIG engine, the mixture preparation, especially the fuel stratification around the spark plug, should be accurately controlled. As the angled intake scavenge ports produce strong swirl flow motion and complex transfer between the swirl and tumble flows in the 2-stroke BUSDIG engine, the interaction between the in-cylinder flow motions and the direct injection and its impact on the charge preparation in the BUSDIG engine are investigated in this study by three dimensional (3D) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Both the single injection and split injections are applied and their impact on the mixture formation process is investigated. The start of injection (SOI) timing and split injection ratio are adjusted accordingly to optimize the charge preparation for each injection strategy. The results show that the strong interaction between the fuel injection and in-cylinder flow motions dominates the mixture preparation in the BUSDIG engine. Compared to the single injection, the split injection shows less impact on the large scale flow motions. Good fuel stratification around the spark plug was obtained by the late SOI timings at 300/320 °CA with the equal amount in each injection. However, when a higher tumble flow motion is produced by the 8 scavenge ports design, the better fuel charge stratification can be achieved with the later single injection at SOI of 320 °CA.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE on behalf of IMechEen_US
dc.subjectcomputational fluid dynamicsen_US
dc.subjecttwo-stroke engineen_US
dc.subjectuniflowen_US
dc.subjectdirect injectionen_US
dc.subjectfuel stratificationen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of mixture formation process in a two-stroke boosted uniflow scavenged direct injection gasoline engineen_US
dc.title.alternativeAnalysis of Mixture Formation Process in a 2-Stroke Boosted Uniflow Scavenged Direct Injection Gasoline (BUSDIG) engine-
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1468087417736451-
dc.relation.isPartOfInternational Journal of Engine Research-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf6.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.