Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) >
Special Research Institutes >
Institute for the Environment >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Testicular dysgenesis syndrome and the estrogen hypothesis: A quantitative meta-analysis|
|Authors: ||Martin, OV|
|Publication Date: ||2008|
|Publisher: ||National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences|
|Citation: ||Environmental Health Perspectives 116: 149-157, Feb 2008|
|Abstract: ||BACKGROUND: Male reproductive tract abnormalities such as hypospadias and cryptorchidism, and testicular cancer have been proposed to comprise a common syndrome together with impaired spermatogenesis with a common etiology resulting from the disruption of gonadal development during fetal life, the testicular dysgenesis syndrome (TDS). The hypothesis that in utero exposure to estrogenic agents could induce these disorders was first proposed in 1993. The only quantitative summary estimate of the association between prenatal exposure to estrogenic agents and testicular cancer was published over 10 years ago, and other systematic reviews of the association between estrogenic compounds, other than the potent pharmaceutical estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES), and
TDS end points have remained inconclusive.
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a quantitative meta-analysis of the association between the end points related to TDS and prenatal exposure to estrogenic agents. Inclusion in this analysis was based on mechanistic criteria, and the plausibility of an estrogen receptor (ER)-–mediated mode of action was specifically explored.
RESULTS: We included in this meta-analysis eight studies investigating the etiology of hypospadias and/or cryptorchidism that had not been identified in previous systematic reviews. Four additional studies of pharmaceutical estrogens yielded a statistically significant updated summary estimate for testicular cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: The doubling of the risk ratios for all three end points investigated after DES exposure is consistent with a shared etiology and the TDS hypothesis but does not constitute evidence of an estrogenic mode of action. Results of the subset analyses point to the existence of unidentified sources of heterogeneity between studies or within the study population.|
|Appears in Collections:||Environment|
Institute for the Environment
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.