Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/16600
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSen, D-
dc.contributor.authorPesyridis, A-
dc.contributor.authorWillmington, G-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-20T08:34:56Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-14-
dc.date.available2018-07-20T08:34:56Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationApplied Sciences (Bucureşti), 2018, 11 (6)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1454-5101-
dc.identifier.issnhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en11061568-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/16600-
dc.description.abstractThis paper proposes a compression system for a scramjet, to be used as part of a combined cycle engine on a hypersonic transport vehicle that can achieve sustained flight at 8 Mach 8. Initially research into scramjet compression system and shock wave interaction was conducted to establish the foundation of the scramjet inlet and isolator sections. A Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) campaign was conducted, where the shock structure and flow characteristics was analysed between Mach 4.5–8. The compression system of a scramjet is of crucial importance in providing air at suitable Mach number, pressure and temperature to the combustion chamber. The use of turbojet engines in over-under configuration with the scramjet was investigated as well as the study of a combined cycle scramjet-ramjet configuration. It was identified that locating the scramjet in the centre with a rotated ramjet on either side, where its ramps make up the scramjet wall was the most optimal configuration, as it mitigated the effect of the oblique shocks propagating from the scramjet walls into the adjacent ramjet. Furthermore, this meant that the forebody of the vehicle could solely be used as the compression surface by the scramjet. In this paper, the sizing of the scramjet combustion chamber and nozzle were modified to match the flow properties of the oncoming flow with the purpose of producing the most optimum scramjet configuration for the cruise speed of Mach 8. CFD simulations showed that the scramjet inlet did not provide the levels of compression and stagnation pressure recovery initially required. However, it was found that the scramjet provided significantly more thrust than the drag of the aircraft at sustained Mach 8 flight, due to its utilisation of a very aerodynamic vehicle design.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBalkan Society of Geometersen_US
dc.subjectScramjeten_US
dc.subjectRamjeten_US
dc.subjectHypersonicen_US
dc.subjectCombustionen_US
dc.subjectHypersonic engine integrationen_US
dc.subjectCombined cycle engineen_US
dc.titleScramjet Compression System and Hybrid Engine Configuration for Sustained Hypersonic Flighten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en11061568-
dc.relation.isPartOfApplied Sciences (Bucureşti)-
pubs.issue6-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume11-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf21.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.