Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22237
Title: Birth attendants’ hand hygiene compliance in healthcare facilities in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review
Authors: Gon, G
de Barra, M
Dansero, L
Nash, S
Campbell, OMR
Keywords: Hand hygiene;Maternal and newborn health;Labour;Healthcare workers
Issue Date: 3-Dec-2020
Publisher: BMC
Citation: Gon, G., de Barra, M., Dansero, L. et al. Birth attendants’ hand hygiene compliance in healthcare facilities in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 20, 1116 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05925-9
Abstract: © 2020, The Author(s). Background: With an increasing number of women delivering in healthcare facilities in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs), healthcare workers’ hand hygiene compliance on labour wards is pivotal to preventing infections. Currently there are no estimates of how often birth attendants comply with hand hygiene, or of the factors influencing compliance in healthcare facilities in LMICs. Methods: We conducted a systematic review to investigate the a) level of compliance, b) determinants of compliance and c) interventions to improve hand hygiene during labour and delivery among birth attendants in healthcare facilities of LMICs. We also aimed to assess the quality of the included studies and to report the intra-cluster correlation for studies conducted in multiple facilities. Results: We obtained 797 results across four databases and reviewed 71 full texts. Of these, fifteen met our inclusion criteria. Overall, the quality of the included studies was particularly compromised by poorly described sampling methods and definitions. Hand hygiene compliance varied substantially across studies from 0 to 100%; however, the heterogeneity in definitions of hand hygiene did not allow us to combine or compare these meaningfully. The five studies with larger sample sizes and clearer definitions estimated compliance before aseptic procedures opportunities, to be low (range: 1–38%). Three studies described two multi-component interventions, both were shown to be feasible. Conclusions: Hand hygiene compliance was low for studies with larger sample sizes and clear definitions. This poses a substantial challenge to infection prevention during birth in LMICs facilities. We also found that the quality of many studies was suboptimal. Future studies of hand hygiene compliance on the labour ward should be designed with better sampling frames, assess inter-observer agreement, use measures to improve the quality of data collection, and report their hand hygiene definitions clearly.
URI: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22237
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05925-9
ISSN: 1472-6963
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf1.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.