MEM vs. FEM: Practical crashworthiness insights for Macro Element Modelling applied to sub-assembly and full vehicle automotive structures

Abstract

Copyright © 2021The Author(s). This paper proposes a modelling approach for integral vehicle structures, applied to frontal crash loading, based on the Macro element approach. Addressing the idealisation of complex sub-structures and full vehicle was through identification of critical parameters for conversion of validated FEM into MEM equivalents through sensitivity analyses. Two examples of impact onto rigid barriers are presented; 1). Frontal crash energy management system (consisting crush-can and longitudinal engine rail), impacting at 8.6 m/s and 2). A complete vehicle impact at 56 km/hr (15m/s). Both case studies predict key features of collapse, with force-time histories agreeing within ±10–15% against FEM. Case study 1 required a 3 second solution time versus 1.5 h (8CPUS) mass-scaled FEM (105k element). For Case study 2, MEM required 7.5mins versus 16.5 hrs for a 3 M element FEM vehicle. For all simulations, LS-DYNA R10.0 and Visual Crash Studio R4.0 used. Developing a framework to overcome accuracy/stability problems, together with issues related to robustness and error reduction is discussed. Model complexity was progressive, involving a-priori knowledge of collapse and/or analysing several sub-assemblies to guide idealisation. The level of agreement demonstrates the advantages of MEM as a complementary method to support conceptual vehicle design and offers significant advantages for design exploration, particularly across multiple crash certification cases.