Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27329
Title: Energy recovery from domestic radiators using a compact composite metal Foam/PCM latent heat storage
Authors: Talebizadehsardari, P
Babaei-Mahani, R
Giddings, D
Yasseri, S
Moghimi, MA
Bahai, H
Keywords: latent heat storage;compact design;phase change material;porous medium;radiator;charging/discharging
Issue Date: 12-Feb-2020
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Talebizadeh Sardari, P. et al. (2020) 'Energy recovery from domestic radiators using a compact composite metal Foam/PCM latent heat storage', Journal of Cleaner Production, 257 (1 June 2020), 120504, pp. 1 - 12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120504.
Abstract: With the increasing demand for energy consumption in domestic buildings and consequent CO2 emission, there is a need to provide proper products to reduce energy loss. Domestic radiators for space heating can be improved by using a Compact Latent Heat Storage (CLHS) unit mounted on the wall side surface in order to offer energy saving and peak-shaving. The unit offers the potential to save otherwise wasted energy from the back surface of the radiator to the walls in the charging mode of the energy storage system. When the heating system is turned off, the CLHS unit discharges the stored heat towards the room to provide a uniform temperature on the surface of the radiator. An aluminium foam embedded inside the bulk Phase Change Material (PCM) can modify the heat storage/retrieval rate. A PCM is selected depending on the radiator’s surface temperature, which is almost equal to the hot water temperature delivered to the radiator. Different metal foam porosities are examined and compared with the PCM-only alternative (i.e. without metal foam enhancement). The results show the porous-PCM CLHS alternative provides an almost constant temperature during the discharging process equal to 54 °C. However, for the PCM-only alternative, the temperature of the surface reduces continuously. Using the porous medium results in a shorter melting time, about 95% of what is needed for the PCM-only alternative. Increasing the metal foam porosity results in shorter charging/discharging time; however, since the surface temperature of the porous-PCM unit is almost constant for different metal foam porosities, a system with higher porosity (97%) is desirable.
Description: Research data for this article: Data not available / Data will be made available on request.
Supplementary data are available online at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620305515?via%3Dihub#appsec1 .
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27329
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120504
ISSN: 0959-6526
Other Identifiers: ORCID iDs: Pouyan Talebizadehsardari https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5947-8701; Sirous Yasseri https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1485-9660; Hamid Bahai https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3476-9104.
120504
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (see: https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/sharing).) The version of record is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120504 .4.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons