Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/3928
Title: Interpretive bias in acupuncture research? A case study
Authors: O'Connell, N E
Wand, B M
Goldacre, B
Keywords: Acupuncture;Clinical trials;Interpretive bias;Back pain
Issue Date: 2009
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Citation: Evaluation and the Health Professions. 32 (4) 393-409
Abstract: Acupuncture is one of the most widely used and broadly researched of the complementary and alternative therapies, but high quality trials generally show no benefit over sham acupuncture. Many would view this result as evidence of ineffectiveness for this intervention. This discussion paper focuses on the report of one large multi-centre randomised controlled trial of acupuncture for chronic low back pain in the lay and academic press, the ensuing discussion, and its impact on both clinical practice and service provision. We suggest that interpretive bias has affected reporting, leading to questionable conclusions and advocacy in favour of this form of care which may exceed the evidence. We also suggest that a lack of understanding of research into the placebo effect may have contributed to confusion in the interpretation of these trials.
URI: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/3928
ISSN: 0163-2787
Appears in Collections:Community Health and Public Health
Dept of Clinical Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Embargoed Paper.txt80 BTextView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.