Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Incomplete citizens: Changing images of post-separation children|
|Authors: ||Kaganas, F|
|Publication Date: ||2004|
|Publisher: ||John Wiley & Sons, Inc|
|Citation: ||Modern Law Review, 67(6): 959 - 981, 2004|
|Abstract: ||The image of the child as the victim of separation or divorce is well-established in legal, socio-legal and popular discourse. However, the authors argue, alongside this traditional image of the child, there is a different image of the child emerging, that of the autonomous, responsible child. This is apparent in academic discourse, policy documents and legal pronouncements. This child is included in the project of ‘remoralising’ the family by building the ‘good’ post-separation family. The ‘good’ child of separation or divorce is responsible for safeguarding his or her own welfare and is expected to make those choices that are assumed to best protect his or her best interests. In order to ensure that the child makes the ‘right’ decisions, he or she, like the adults concerned, is the target of education, information and therapeutic intervention. There is a blending of paradigms in which the ideal child is both an autonomous social actor and a vulnerable object of concern.|
|Description: ||The final version of this article may be accessed at the link below.|
|Appears in Collections:||Publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.