Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) >
Schools >
School of Health Sciences and Social Care >
School of Health Sciences and Social Care Research Papers >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5596

Title: Health systems performance in sub-Saharan Africa: Governance, outcome and equity
Authors: Olafsdottir, AE
Reidpath, DD
Pokhrel, S
Allotey, P
Publication Date: 2011
Publisher: Biomed Central
Citation: BMC Public Health 2011, 11:237, Apr 2011
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The literature on health systems focuses largely on the performance of healthcare systems operationalised around indicators such as hospital beds, maternity care and immunisation coverage. A broader definition of health systems however, needs to include the wider determinants of health including, possibly, governance and its relationship to health and health equity. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between health systems outcomes and equity, and governance as a part of a process to extend the range of indicators used to assess health systems performance. METHODS: Using cross sectional data from 46 countries in the African region of the World Health Organization, an ecological analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between governance and health systems performance. The data were analysed using multiple linear regression and a standard progressive modelling procedure. The under-five mortality rate (U5MR) was used as the health outcome measure and the ratio of U5MR in the wealthiest and poorest quintiles was used as the measure of health equity. Governance was measured using two contextually relevant indices developed by the Mo Ibrahim Foundation. RESULTS: Governance was strongly associated with U5MR and moderately associated with the U5MR quintile ratio. After controlling for possible confounding by healthcare, finance, education, and water and sanitation, governance remained significantly associated with U5MR. Governance was not, however, significantly associated with equity in U5MR outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the quality of governance may be an important structural determinant of health systems performance, and could be an indicator to be monitored. The association suggests there might be a causal relationship. However, the cross-sectional design, the level of missing data, and the small sample size, forces tentative conclusions. Further research will be needed to assess the causal relationship, and its generalizability beyond U5MR as a health outcome measure, as well as the geographical generalizability of the results.
Description: Copyright @ 2011 Olafsdottir et al.
URI: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/237/abstract
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5596
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-237
ISSN: 1471-2458
Appears in Collections:School of Health Sciences and Social Care Research Papers
Community Health and Public Health
Brunel OA Publishing Fund

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Fulltext.pdf216.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 


Library (c) Brunel University.    Powered By: DSpace
Send us your
Feedback. Last Updated: September 14, 2010.
Managed by:
Hassan Bhuiyan