Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) >
University >
Publications >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/6068

Title: Effect of exercise referral schemes in primary care on physical activity and improving health outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Pavey, TG
Taylor, AH
Fox, KR
Hillsdon, M
Anokye, NK
Campbell, JL
Foster, C
Green, C
Moxham, T
Mutrie, N
Searle, J
Trueman, P
Taylor, RS
Publication Date: 2011
Publisher: BMJ publishing group
Citation: BMJ, 343: d6462, Nov 2011
Abstract: Objective: To assess the impact of exercise referral schemes on physical activity and health outcomes. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and ongoing trial registries up to October 2009. We also checked study references. Study selection Design: randomised controlled trials or non-randomised controlled (cluster or individual) studies published in peer review journals. Population: sedentary individuals with or without medical diagnosis. Exercise referral schemes defined as: clear referrals by primary care professionals to third party service providers to increase physical activity or exercise, physical activity or exercise programmes tailored to individuals, and initial assessment and monitoring throughout programmes. Comparators: usual care, no intervention, or alternative exercise referral schemes. Results Eight randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, comparing exercise referral schemes with usual care (six trials), alternative physical activity intervention (two), and an exercise referral scheme plus a self determination theory intervention (one). Compared with usual care, follow-up data for exercise referral schemes showed an increased number of participants who achieved 90-150 minutes of physical activity of at least moderate intensity per week (pooled relative risk 1.16, 95% confidence intervals 1.03 to 1.30) and a reduced level of depression (pooled standardised mean difference −0.82, −1.28 to −0.35). Evidence of a between group difference in physical activity of moderate or vigorous intensity or in other health outcomes was inconsistent at follow-up. We did not find any difference in outcomes between exercise referral schemes and the other two comparator groups. None of the included trials separately reported outcomes in individuals with specific medical diagnoses. Substantial heterogeneity in the quality and nature of the exercise referral schemes across studies might have contributed to the inconsistency in outcome findings. Conclusions Considerable uncertainty remains as to the effectiveness of exercise referral schemes for increasing physical activity, fitness, or health indicators, or whether they are an efficient use of resources for sedentary people with or without a medical diagnosis.
Description: This is an open access article - Copyright @ 2011 BMJ
Sponsorship: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) programme (project number 08/72/01) (www.hta.ac.uk/).
URI: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/6068
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6462
ISSN: 0959-8138
Appears in Collections:Publications
Health Economics Research Group (HERG)

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Fulltext.pdf1.38 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 


Library (c) Brunel University.    Powered By: DSpace
Send us your
Feedback. Last Updated: September 14, 2010.
Managed by:
Hassan Bhuiyan