Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10737
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShanahan, Mark-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-05T10:41:18Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-05T10:41:18Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10737-
dc.descriptionThis thesis was submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and awarded by Brunel University Londonen_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Historians of the early space age have established a norm whereby President Eisenhower's actions are judged solely as a response to the launch of the Sputnik satellite, and are indicative of a passive, negative presidency. His low-key actions are seen merely as a prelude to the US triumph in space in the 1960s. This study presents an alternative view showing that Eisenhower’s space policy was not a reaction to the heavily-propagandised Soviet satellite launches, or even the effect they caused in the US political and military elites, but the continuation of a strategic track. In so doing, it also contributes to the reassessment of the wider Eisenhower presidency. Having assessed the development of three intersecting discourses: Eisenhower as president; the genesis of the US space programme; and developments in Cold War US reconnaissance, this thesis charts Eisenhower’s influence both on the ICBM and reconnaissance programmes and his support for a non-military approach to the International Geophysical Year. These actions provided the basis for his space policy for the remainder of his presidency. The following chapters show that Sputnik had no impact on the policies already in place and highlight Eisenhower’s pragmatic activism in enabling the implementation of these policies by a carefully-chosen group of expert ‘helping hands’. This study delivers a new interpretation of Eisenhower’s actions. It argues that he was operating on a parallel track that started with the Castle H-bomb tests; developed through the CIA's reconnaissance efforts and was distilled in the Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958. This set a policy for US involvement in outer space that matched Eisenhower’s desire for a balanced budget and fundamental belief in maintaining peace. By challenging the orthodox view, this paper shows that President Eisenhower’s space policy actions were strategic steps that provided a logical next step for both civilian and military space programmes at the completion of the International Geophysical Yearen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/10737/1/FulltextThesis.pdf-
dc.subjectUS political historyen_US
dc.subjectSpace policyen_US
dc.subjectCold Waren_US
dc.subjectRevisionismen_US
dc.subjectHelping handsen_US
dc.titleEisenhower’s parallel track reassessing President Eisenhower’s activism through an analysis of the development of the first US space policyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:History
Brunel Law School Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FulltextThesis.pdf2.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.