Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10861
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sharpe, RM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Turner, KJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sumpter, JP | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-14T11:06:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 1998-05 | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-14T11:06:48Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1998 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Environmental Health Perspectives, 1998, 106 (5), pp. A220 - A221 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0091-6765 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10861 | - |
dc.description.abstract | There is currently much debate as to which in vivo tests should be selected for the detection of adverse effects of endocrine disruptors in test animals. As co-authors of a much-cited article in Environmental Health Perspectives. which described small (but significant) decreases in testicular weight of adult rats that had been exposed developmentally to either of two environmental estrogens, we would like to bring certain of our experiences to the attention of readers of EHP and to those involved in framing and implementing regulatory guidelines in this area. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | A220 - A221 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | Endocrine Disruptors | en_US |
dc.subject | Enviroment Estrogens | en_US |
dc.title | Endocrine disruptors and testis development | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Environmental Health Perspectives | - |
pubs.issue | 5 | - |
pubs.issue | 5 | - |
pubs.volume | 106 | - |
pubs.volume | 106 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Environment |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | 740.09 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.