Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20439
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt Rivera, XC-
dc.contributor.authorGallego-Schmid, A-
dc.contributor.authorNajdanovic-Visak, V-
dc.contributor.authorAzapagic, A-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-02T12:56:05Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-
dc.date.available2020-03-02T12:56:05Z-
dc.date.issued2020-02-27-
dc.identifier.citationSchmidt Rivera, X.C., Gallego-Schmid, A., Najdanovic-Visak, V. and Azapagic, A. (2020) '', Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020, 157, 104751, pp. 1 - 12. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104751.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0921-3449-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20439-
dc.description.abstract© 2020 The Authors. Spent coffee grounds (SCGs) have a potential to be used as a feedstock for higher value-added products, such as biodiesel. However, the environmental implications of the valorisation of SCGs are largely unknown. This study evaluates the life cycle environmental impacts of utilising SCGs for biodiesel production in comparison with the widely used disposal of SCGs as a waste stream: incineration, landfilling, anaerobic digestion, composting and direct application to land. The scope is from cradle to grave and the functional unit is defined as ‘treatment of 1 tonne of SCGs’. The results show that the most environmentally sustainable option is incineration of SCGs, with net-negative impacts (savings) in 14 out of 16 categories, followed by direct application of SCGs to land with 11 net-negative impacts. Biodiesel production is the least sustainable option with the highest impacts in 11 categories, followed by composting. The paper also demonstrates that following various waste hierarchy and resource valorisation guidelines instead of a life cycle approach could lead to a choice of environmentally inferior SCG utilisation options. Therefore, these guidelines should be revised to ensure that they are consistent and underpinned by life cycle thinking, thus aiding sustainable resource management in a circular economy context.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (Gr. no. EP/K011820/1) and The University of Manchester through the N8 AgriFood Local Pump Priming Funden_US
dc.format.extent104751 - 104751-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageen-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0/-
dc.subjectbio-economyen_US
dc.subjectcircular economyen_US
dc.subjectfood wasteen_US
dc.subjectlife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.subjectresource efficiencyen_US
dc.titleLife cycle environmental sustainability of valorisation routes for spent coffee grounds: From waste to resourcesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104751-
dc.relation.isPartOfResources, Conservation and Recycling-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume157-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0658-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Chemical Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf1.8 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons