Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21892
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLai, CS-
dc.contributor.authorLocatelli, G-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-23T09:46:09Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-23T09:46:09Z-
dc.date.issued2020-11-19-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Chun Sing Lai https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4169-4438-
dc.identifier119290-
dc.identifier.citationLai, C.S. and Locatelli, G. (2021) 'Valuing the option to prototype: A case study with Generation Integrated Energy Storage', Energy, 217, 119290, pp. 1 - 15. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119290.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0360-5442-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21892-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2020 The Author(s). New energy generation and storage systems are continuously being developed due to climate change, resource scarcity, and environmental laws. Some systems are incremental innovations of existing systems while others are radical innovations. Radical innovation systems are risky investments due to their relevant technical and economic uncertainties. Prototyping can hedge these risks by spending a fraction of the cost of a full-scale system and in return receiving economic and technical information regarding the system. In economic terms, prototyping is an option to hedge risk coming at a cost that needs to be properly assessed. Real options analysis is the project appraisal approach for these assessments. This paper aims to introduce and test an algorithm based on real options analysis to quantitatively assess the “option to prototype” in the energy sector. First, the interrelated research areas of prototyping, energy systems, and real options analysis are reviewed. Then, a novel algorithm is presented and applied to an innovative Generation Integrated Energy Storage system: Wind-driven Thermal Pumping to demonstrate the effectiveness of option to prototype and the main parameters influencing this decision. Results show that the cost of the prototype and the market size (number of identical systems to build) are key parameters.-
dc.description.sponsorshipEPSRC grant “GIES: Generation Integrated Energy Storage: A Paradigm Shift” (EP/P022049/1).en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 15-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.urihttps://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/25232/pdf/-
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectprototypingen_US
dc.subjectreal options analysisen_US
dc.subjectgeneration integrated energy storageen_US
dc.subjectenergy infrastructureen_US
dc.subjectinvestment risken_US
dc.titleValuing the option to prototype: A case study with Generation Integrated Energy Storageen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119290-
dc.relation.isPartOfEnergy-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume217-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6785-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Electronic and Electrical Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).1.91 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons