Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32942
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGatersleben, B-
dc.contributor.authorWhite, E-
dc.contributor.authorWyles, KJ-
dc.contributor.authorGolding, SE-
dc.contributor.authorMurrell, G-
dc.contributor.authorScarles, C-
dc.contributor.authorXu, T-
dc.contributor.authorBrockett, BFT-
dc.contributor.authorWillis, C-
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-06T17:38:03Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-06T17:38:03Z-
dc.date.issued2024-02-17-
dc.identifierORCiD: Caroline Scarles https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8279-3689-
dc.identifier.citationGatersleben, B. et al. (2024) 'Everyday places to get away – Lessons learned from Covid-19 lockdowns', Landscape and Urban Planning, 246, 105026, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105026.en-US
dc.identifier.issn0169-2046-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32942-
dc.descriptionHighlights: • During Covid-19 people visited a wide range of nearby places to get away from everyday demands, without needing to travel. • People engaged with a wide range of activities in those places, but many activities were place dependent. • All place visits benefitted hedonic and eudemonic wellbeing, but outdoor activities were more beneficial than indoor activities. • Place and activity choices varied between people. Younger people and those living in urban areas visited less outdoor places. • To support wellbeing for all it is important to identify the variety of nearby places people visit and manage access and provision of such places.en-US
dc.descriptionData availability: Data will be made available on request.-
dc.description.abstractBeing able to get away from everyday stressors and demands, even if close to home and just for a few minutes, is important for wellbeing. During the Covid-19 lockdown periods, people’s ability to get away changed significantly. An increase in visits to nearby natural places is well documented. Little is known about other types of places people visited to get away. An online UK survey was conducted in 2020 (N = 850) investigating what places people visited to get away during the pandemic, what they did in those places, how place and activity choices were related to each other and to demographic variables, and to recalled hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing during those visits. Participants visited a rich array of places and engaged in a variety of activities that supported their hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing needs. Responses were grouped into four types of places (at home outdoors, at home indoors, away from home outdoors, and away from home indoors) and seven activity types (cognitive, walks, nature engagement, social activities, technology use, relaxing, and exercise). Place and activity choices were strongly linked. Visiting outdoor places was most beneficial for wellbeing (and most common), especially when it involved mindful engagement with nature (bird watching, gardening) or exercise. Staying indoors, engaging with technologies (computers, television) was least beneficial and more common among those with no degree or job, living in urban areas, and identifying as male. The findings demonstrate the importance of understanding place-activity interactions to support the wellbeing benefits derived from visits to places to get away.en-US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research that this paper is based upon is funded by UKRI under Ideas to Address COVID-19 grant call. Nature Engagement and Wellbeing Pre-, During and Post Covid-19: Supporting the UK (Green) Recovery. Grant number ES/V005464/1.en-US
dc.format.extent1–14-
dc.languageen-US-
dc.language.isoenen-US
dc.publisherElsevieren-US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectactivitiesen-US
dc.subjectwellbeingen-US
dc.subjectplaceen-US
dc.subjectCovid19en-US
dc.subjectoutdooren-US
dc.subjectbeing awayen-US
dc.subjectrestorative environmenten-US
dc.titleEveryday places to get away – Lessons learned from Covid-19 lockdownsen-US
dc.typeArticleen-US
dc.date.dateAccepted2024-02-07-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105026-
dc.relation.isPartOfLandscape and Urban Planning-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume246-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-6062-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-02-07-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
dc.contributor.orcidScarles, Caroline [0000-0001-8279-3689]-
dc.identifier.number105026-
Appears in Collections:Department of Business Analytics and Marketing Research Papers *

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).725.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons