Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33303
Title: Exploring the legal, policy, ethical and practical implications of digitisation of botanical and fungal collections
Other Titles: Plants, People, Planet
Authors: Dhanda, S
Lee, E
Livermore, T
Paton, AJ
Westenberger, P
Williams, C
Milliken, W
Nesbitt, M
Begum, N
Hudson, M
Keywords: digitisation;policy;access and benefit sharing;equity;data sovereignty;infrastructure
Issue Date: 7-May-2026
Publisher: California Digital Library (CDL) on behalf of the Society for Open, Reliable, and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary biology (SORTEE)
Citation: Dhanda, S. et al. (2026) 'Exploring the legal, policy, ethical and practical implications of digitisation of botanical and fungal collections', [Version 7 May 2026]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32942/X2K38Z.
Abstract: Collections-based institutions around the world hold an extraordinary wealth of information and knowledge through the specimens and associated information that they house.. In recent years, institutions holding botanical and fungal collections have invested significant energy and resources into the digitisation of these collections to make them more accessible and better connected. Digitisation poses a wide range of legal, policy and ethical questions, relating to Open Access, Access and Benefit Sharing, data sovereignty and more. Overlapping policy and legal frameworks at global and, increasingly, national levels create a complex landscape, particularly as new technologies such as AI are applied to digitised collections. This paper reviews the roles and responsibilities of institutions, funders and governments in navigating these challenges, to reduce the risk of reproducing historical biases associated with these collections and to ensure that data can be accessed equitably. We explore three case studies - from University of Trans-Disciplinary Health Sciences and Technology (TDU) University in Bengaluru, India and from Manaaki Whenua, New Zealand, to offer insight into equitable approaches to digitising specimens and linking to Traditional Knowledge and Indigenous communities and use these to outline three options that institutions should consider to help navigate this complex landscape.
Description: This is a preprint version archived at EcoEvoRxiv hosted by California Digital Library (CDL) on behalf of the Society for Open, Reliable, and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary biology (SORTEE). It has not been certified by peer review.
Data and Code Availability Statement: N/A
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33303
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32942/X2K38Z
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Tom Livermore https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0283-4597
ORCiD: Paula Westenberger https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3177-2946
Appears in Collections:Brunel Law School Research Papers *

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Preprint.pdfCopyright © 2026 The Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).441.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.