Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33476
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWen, T-H-
dc.contributor.authorYuen, TYP-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, X-
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-20T08:08:39Z-
dc.date.available2026-06-20T08:08:39Z-
dc.date.issued2026-01-13-
dc.identifierORCiD: Xiangming Zhou https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7977-0718-
dc.identifier.citationWen, T.-H., Yuen, T.Y.P. and Zhou, X. (2026) 'Enhancing out-of-plane seismic resistance of masonry walls with fiber-reinforced overlays: tests, modeling, and fragility analysis', Structures, 84, 111119, pp. 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2026.111119.en-US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33476-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the out-of-plane seismic performance and fragility of masonry walls retrofitted with basalt fiber grid (BFG), carbon fiber–reinforced polymer (CFRP), glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP), and ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC). Large-scale masonry wall specimens were tested under lateral loading to examine strength, deformation capacity, and failure mechanisms. This study focuses on the pure out-of-plane response of masonry walls, without considering in-plane forces or deformations. All retrofitted walls significantly outperformed the unreinforced masonry (URM) wall, which failed at 11.34 kN. Peak strengths reached 40.79 kN (GFRP), 30.92 kN (UHPC), 24.88 kN (BFG), and 21.39 kN (CFRP), with varying ductility and crack patterns. Discrete finite element models, calibrated against experimental results, were employed to perform incremental dynamic analysis and derive seismic fragility curves. Results show that retrofitting markedly reduced failure probabilities, raising median spectral acceleration thresholds by factors of 3–7 compared with URM. Among the methods, GFRP achieved the most favorable fragility performance, exhibiting both high capacity and low drift exceedance. These findings demonstrate that retrofit material choice and configuration are critical for improving seismic resilience and reducing collapse risk in masonry structures.en-US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe support of the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), R.O.C., under Grant Numbers 112–2221-E-A49–023-, 110–2221-E-A49–133-, and 109–2636-E-006–015-, and of the British Council through the International Science Partnerships Fund (ISPF) under the Grant Agreement 1181369271, is gratefully acknowledged.en-US
dc.format.extentpp. 1–17-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.languageEnglishen-US
dc.language.isoengen-US
dc.publisherElsevier on behalf of Institution of Structural Engineersen-US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectmasonryen-US
dc.subjectretrofittingen-US
dc.subjectout-of-planeen-US
dc.subjectbasalt fiberen-US
dc.subjectFRPen-US
dc.subjectUHPCen-US
dc.subjectdiscrete finite element modelingen-US
dc.subjectincremental dynamic analysisen-US
dc.subjectfragility curvesen-US
dc.titleEnhancing out-of-plane seismic resistance of masonry walls with fiber-reinforced overlays: tests, modeling, and fragility analysisen-US
dc.typeArticleen-US
dc.date.dateAccepted2026-01-09-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2026.111119-
dc.relation.isPartOfStructuresen-US
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume84-
dc.identifier.eissn2352-0124-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2026-01-09-
dc.rights.holderInstitution of Structural Engineers-
dc.contributor.orcidZhou, Xiangming [0000-0001-7977-0718]-
dc.identifier.number111119-
Appears in Collections:Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Embargoed Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfEmbargoed until 13 January 2027. Copyright © 2026 Institution of Structural Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (see: https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/sharing).4.49 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons